Radeon Pro Vega 56 vs Tesla P40

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 56

2017Core: 1138 MHzBoost: 1250 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

Tesla P40

2016Core: 1303 MHzBoost: 1531 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro Vega 56

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $5,300 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1364.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.3 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
  • Draws 210W instead of 250W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Tesla P40

2016

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs Unknown).
  • Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro Vega 56: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro Vega 56 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 1328.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $5,699 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 30.3 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • 19% higher power demand at 250W vs 210W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro Vega 56 better than Tesla P40?
Yes. Radeon Pro Vega 56 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 12,104 vs 11,808 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon Pro Vega 56 is a 2017 card with FSR upscaling, while Tesla P40 is a 2016 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Tesla P40 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 24 GB instead of Unknown and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon Pro Vega 56 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $399 MSRP. Radeon Pro Vega 56 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon Pro Vega 56 is about $5,300 cheaper on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $5,699 MSRP, and you are getting 2.5% higher G3D Mark. Tesla P40 is the more forward-looking alternative, so it still has a real case if you care more about future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Tesla P40 make more sense than Radeon Pro Vega 56?
Yes. Tesla P40 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to $5,699 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro Vega 56. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro Vega 56 currently gives you 2.5% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 1364.1%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon Pro Vega 56Tesla P40
1080p
low95 FPS243 FPS
medium82 FPS230 FPS
high70 FPS197 FPS
ultra48 FPS161 FPS
1440p
low79 FPS224 FPS
medium68 FPS189 FPS
high53 FPS151 FPS
ultra36 FPS124 FPS
4K
low31 FPS120 FPS
medium28 FPS99 FPS
high22 FPS75 FPS
ultra19 FPS67 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon Pro Vega 56Tesla P40
1080p
low267 FPS326 FPS
medium227 FPS281 FPS
high178 FPS215 FPS
ultra144 FPS171 FPS
1440p
low189 FPS213 FPS
medium162 FPS179 FPS
high132 FPS146 FPS
ultra105 FPS115 FPS
4K
low100 FPS103 FPS
medium83 FPS84 FPS
high71 FPS70 FPS
ultra55 FPS54 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon Pro Vega 56Tesla P40
1080p
low485 FPS531 FPS
medium417 FPS425 FPS
high363 FPS354 FPS
ultra272 FPS266 FPS
1440p
low386 FPS399 FPS
medium327 FPS319 FPS
high272 FPS266 FPS
ultra204 FPS199 FPS
4K
low245 FPS266 FPS
medium202 FPS213 FPS
high160 FPS177 FPS
ultra123 FPS133 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon Pro Vega 56Tesla P40
1080p
low176 FPS473 FPS
medium144 FPS420 FPS
high123 FPS354 FPS
ultra104 FPS266 FPS
1440p
low127 FPS374 FPS
medium107 FPS319 FPS
high92 FPS266 FPS
ultra78 FPS199 FPS
4K
low73 FPS240 FPS
medium61 FPS213 FPS
high47 FPS177 FPS
ultra37 FPS133 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 56 and Tesla P40

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 56

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1138 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,104 points. Launch price was $399.

NVIDIA

Tesla P40

The Tesla P40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1303 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,808 points. Launch price was $5,699.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 12,104 and the Tesla P40 reaches 11,808 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Tesla P40 uses Pascal, both on 14 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 3,840 (Tesla P40). Raw compute: 8.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 11.76 TFLOPS (Tesla P40). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 1531 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 56Tesla P40
G3D Mark Score
12,104+3%
11,808
Architecture
GCN 5.0
Pascal
Process Node
14 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
3584
3840+7%
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.96 TFLOPS
11.76 TFLOPS+31%
Boost Clock
1250 MHz
1531 MHz+22%
ROPs
64
96+50%
TMUs
224
240+7%
L1 Cache
0.88 MB
1.4 MB+59%
L2 Cache
4 MB+33%
3 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 56Tesla P40
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Tesla P40 has 24 GB. The Tesla P40 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 3 MB (Tesla P40) — the Radeon Pro Vega 56 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 56Tesla P40
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
24 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
4 MB+33%
3 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 12.1 (Tesla P40). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 56Tesla P40
DirectX
12.1
12.1
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (Tesla P40). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Tesla P40).

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 56Tesla P40
Encoder
VCE 4.0
NVENC 4.0 (2x)
Decoder
UVD 7.0
PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 draws 210W versus the Tesla P40's 250W — a 17.4% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 500W (Tesla P40). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 56Tesla P40
TDP
210W-16%
250W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
500W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
267mm
Height
111mm
112mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
85°C
Perf/Watt
57.6+22%
47.2
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 launched at $399 MSRP, while the Tesla P40 launched at $5699. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 costs 93% less ($5300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 30.3 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 2.1 (Tesla P40) — the Radeon Pro Vega 56 offers 1342.9% better value. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 56Tesla P40
MSRP
$399-93%
$5699
Performance per Dollar
30.3+1343%
2.1
Codename
Vega 10
GP102
Release
August 14 2017
September 13 2016
Ranking
#222
#227