
Radeon Pro Vega 56
Popular choices:

Tesla P40
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro Vega 56
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,300 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1364.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.3 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 210W instead of 250W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Tesla P40
2016Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro Vega 56: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro Vega 56 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1328.3% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 30.3 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌19% higher power demand at 250W vs 210W.
Radeon Pro Vega 56
2017Tesla P40
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,300 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1364.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.3 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 210W instead of 250W, a 40W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro Vega 56: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro Vega 56 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1328.3% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 30.3 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌19% higher power demand at 250W vs 210W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro Vega 56 better than Tesla P40?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Tesla P40 make more sense than Radeon Pro Vega 56?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 31 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 67 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 531 FPS |
| medium | 417 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 363 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 327 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 133 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 473 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 374 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 133 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 56 and Tesla P40

Radeon Pro Vega 56
Radeon Pro Vega 56
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1138 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,104 points. Launch price was $399.

Tesla P40
Tesla P40
The Tesla P40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1303 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,808 points. Launch price was $5,699.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 12,104 and the Tesla P40 reaches 11,808 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Tesla P40 uses Pascal, both on 14 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 3,840 (Tesla P40). Raw compute: 8.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 11.76 TFLOPS (Tesla P40). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 1531 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,104+3% | 11,808 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 3840+7% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.96 TFLOPS | 11.76 TFLOPS+31% |
| Boost Clock | 1250 MHz | 1531 MHz+22% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 224 | 240+7% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 1.4 MB+59% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Tesla P40 has 24 GB. The Tesla P40 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 3 MB (Tesla P40) — the Radeon Pro Vega 56 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 24 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 12.1 (Tesla P40). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (Tesla P40). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Tesla P40).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | NVENC 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 draws 210W versus the Tesla P40's 250W — a 17.4% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 500W (Tesla P40). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 210W-16% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 57.6+22% | 47.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 launched at $399 MSRP, while the Tesla P40 launched at $5699. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 costs 93% less ($5300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 30.3 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 2.1 (Tesla P40) — the Radeon Pro Vega 56 offers 1342.9% better value. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-93% | $5699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.3+1343% | 2.1 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | GP102 |
| Release | August 14 2017 | September 13 2016 |
| Ranking | #222 | #227 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













