
Radeon Pro 5700
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Vega 48
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 5700
2020Why buy it
- ✅5.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌77.6% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$450 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.4 vs 25.0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 30W.
Radeon Pro Vega 48
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $349 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 74.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.0 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 130W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 5700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon Pro 5700
2020Radeon Pro Vega 48
2019Why buy it
- ✅5.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $349 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 74.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.0 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 130W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌77.6% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$450 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.4 vs 25.0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 30W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 5700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro 5700 better than Radeon Pro Vega 48?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro Vega 48 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 56 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 215 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 180 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 516 FPS | 453 FPS |
| medium | 413 FPS | 392 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 331 FPS |
| ultra | 258 FPS | 254 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 387 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 194 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 104 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 327 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 233 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 194 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 233 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 37 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5700 and Radeon Pro Vega 48

Radeon Pro 5700
Radeon Pro 5700
The Radeon Pro 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,469 points.

Radeon Pro Vega 48
Radeon Pro Vega 48
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,270 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5700 scores 11,469 and the Radeon Pro Vega 48 reaches 11,270 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 uses GCN 5.0, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 3,072 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Raw compute: 6.221 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 1300 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,469+2% | 11,270 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3072+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.221 TFLOPS | 7.987 TFLOPS+28% |
| Boost Clock | 1350 MHz+4% | 1300 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 192+33% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 5700 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 has 0 MB. The Radeon Pro 5700 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 48).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5700 draws 130W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 48's 30W — a 125% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 30W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 375.7+326% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 5700 launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 launched at $450. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 costs 43.7% less ($349 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.4 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 25.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 48) — the Radeon Pro Vega 48 offers 73.6% better value. The Radeon Pro 5700 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $450-44% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.4 | 25.0+74% |
| Codename | Navi 10 | Vega 10 |
| Release | August 4 2020 | March 19 2019 |
| Ranking | #238 | #241 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












