Radeon Pro 5700 vs Radeon PRO W6600M

AMD

Radeon Pro 5700

2020Core: 1243 MHzBoost: 1350 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon PRO W6600M

2021Core: 1224 MHzBoost: 2034 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro 5700

2020

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W6600M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
  • 44.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 90W.

Radeon PRO W6600M

2021

Why buy it

  • 16.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 90W instead of 130W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon PRO W6600M better than Radeon Pro 5700?
Yes. Radeon PRO W6600M is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 16.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 0.5% higher PassMark G3D performance. It also comes from 2021 instead of 2020, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon PRO W6600M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 2020 and 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon PRO W6600M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $799 MSRP, and you are getting 16.3% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (11,407 vs 11,469). Radeon Pro 5700 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon PRO W6600M is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Radeon Pro 5700 still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.
Is Radeon Pro 5700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. Radeon Pro 5700 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $799 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, Radeon PRO W6600M earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon Pro 5700Radeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low119 FPS140 FPS
medium105 FPS118 FPS
high88 FPS103 FPS
ultra71 FPS71 FPS
1440p
low108 FPS112 FPS
medium90 FPS92 FPS
high71 FPS75 FPS
ultra58 FPS52 FPS
4K
low56 FPS50 FPS
medium50 FPS43 FPS
high32 FPS32 FPS
ultra27 FPS28 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon Pro 5700Radeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low215 FPS243 FPS
medium180 FPS206 FPS
high133 FPS168 FPS
ultra96 FPS134 FPS
1440p
low143 FPS170 FPS
medium120 FPS142 FPS
high92 FPS112 FPS
ultra66 FPS88 FPS
4K
low76 FPS93 FPS
medium65 FPS78 FPS
high53 FPS65 FPS
ultra38 FPS49 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon Pro 5700Radeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low516 FPS513 FPS
medium413 FPS411 FPS
high344 FPS342 FPS
ultra258 FPS257 FPS
1440p
low387 FPS385 FPS
medium310 FPS308 FPS
high258 FPS257 FPS
ultra194 FPS192 FPS
4K
low258 FPS257 FPS
medium206 FPS205 FPS
high172 FPS171 FPS
ultra129 FPS128 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon Pro 5700Radeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low327 FPS262 FPS
medium282 FPS231 FPS
high233 FPS186 FPS
ultra194 FPS157 FPS
1440p
low270 FPS199 FPS
medium233 FPS176 FPS
high179 FPS138 FPS
ultra144 FPS113 FPS
4K
low145 FPS117 FPS
medium116 FPS99 FPS
high101 FPS79 FPS
ultra83 FPS60 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5700 and Radeon PRO W6600M

AMD

Radeon Pro 5700

The Radeon Pro 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,469 points.

AMD

Radeon PRO W6600M

The Radeon PRO W6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1224 MHz to 2034 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,407 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 5700 scores 11,469 and the Radeon PRO W6600M reaches 11,407 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon PRO W6600M uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Raw compute: 6.221 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 7.29 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600M). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 2034 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro 5700Radeon PRO W6600M
G3D Mark Score
11,469
11,407
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
7 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
2304+29%
1792
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.221 TFLOPS
7.29 TFLOPS+17%
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
2034 MHz+51%
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
144+29%
112
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling + RSR
FSR upscaling + RSR

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro 5700Radeon PRO W6600M
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600M) — the Radeon Pro 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro 5700Radeon PRO W6600M
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 5.

FeatureRadeon Pro 5700Radeon PRO W6600M
DirectX
12.1
12.2
Vulkan
1.4+17%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+20%
5
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6600M).

FeatureRadeon Pro 5700Radeon PRO W6600M
Encoder
VCN 2.0
VCN 3.0
Decoder
VCN 2.0
VCN 3.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 5700 draws 130W versus the Radeon PRO W6600M's 90W — a 36.4% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

FeatureRadeon Pro 5700Radeon PRO W6600M
TDP
130W
90W-31%
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80°C
80°C
Perf/Watt
88.2
126.7+44%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon PRO W6600M is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).

FeatureRadeon Pro 5700Radeon PRO W6600M
MSRP
$799
Codename
Navi 10
Navi 23
Release
August 4 2020
June 8 2021
Ranking
#238
#240