
Radeon Pro 5700
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W6600M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 5700
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W6600M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 90W.
Radeon PRO W6600M
2021Why buy it
- ✅16.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 90W instead of 130W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Radeon Pro 5700
2020Radeon PRO W6600M
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅16.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 90W instead of 130W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W6600M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 90W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W6600M better than Radeon Pro 5700?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 5700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 56 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 28 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 215 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 180 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 516 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 413 FPS | 411 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 258 FPS | 257 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 387 FPS | 385 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 194 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 128 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 327 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 233 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 194 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 233 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 60 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5700 and Radeon PRO W6600M

Radeon Pro 5700
Radeon Pro 5700
The Radeon Pro 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,469 points.

Radeon PRO W6600M
Radeon PRO W6600M
The Radeon PRO W6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1224 MHz to 2034 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,407 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5700 scores 11,469 and the Radeon PRO W6600M reaches 11,407 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon PRO W6600M uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Raw compute: 6.221 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 7.29 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600M). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 2034 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,469 | 11,407 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+29% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.221 TFLOPS | 7.29 TFLOPS+17% |
| Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | 2034 MHz+51% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144+29% | 112 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600M) — the Radeon Pro 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 5.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+20% | 5 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6600M).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5700 draws 130W versus the Radeon PRO W6600M's 90W — a 36.4% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 90W-31% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 126.7+44% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W6600M is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | — |
| Codename | Navi 10 | Navi 23 |
| Release | August 4 2020 | June 8 2021 |
| Ranking | #238 | #240 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












