
Radeon Pro 5700
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 5700
2020Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7400 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7400 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌301.5% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.4 vs 58.6 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Radeon RX 7400
2025Why buy it
- ✅27.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $600 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 308% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro 5700
2020Radeon RX 7400
2025Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅27.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $600 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 308% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7400 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7400 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌301.5% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.4 vs 58.6 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7400 better than Radeon Pro 5700?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 5700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 56 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 215 FPS | 337 FPS |
| medium | 180 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 516 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 413 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 258 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 387 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 194 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 131 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 327 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 233 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 194 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 233 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 131 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5700 and Radeon RX 7400

Radeon Pro 5700
Radeon Pro 5700
The Radeon Pro 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,469 points.

Radeon RX 7400
Radeon RX 7400
The Radeon RX 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,654 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5700 scores 11,469 and the Radeon RX 7400 reaches 11,654 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon RX 7400 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 7 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 7400). Raw compute: 6.221 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7400). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 2300 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,469 | 11,654+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+29% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.221 TFLOPS | 16.49 TFLOPS+165% |
| Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | 2300 MHz+70% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144+29% | 112 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR 3 + AFMF |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7400 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro 5700 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7400) — the Radeon Pro 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7400). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7400). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7400).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5700 draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 7400's 43W — a 100.6% difference. The Radeon RX 7400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 450W (Radeon RX 7400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 43W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 271.0+207% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 5700 launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7400 launched at $199. The Radeon RX 7400 costs 75.1% less ($600 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.4 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 58.6 (Radeon RX 7400) — the Radeon RX 7400 offers 306.9% better value. The Radeon RX 7400 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $199-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.4 | 58.6+307% |
| Codename | Navi 10 | Navi 33 |
| Release | August 4 2020 | August 8 2025 |
| Ranking | #238 | #229 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












