
Radeon Pro 5700
Popular choices:

Tesla P40
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 5700
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,900 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 592.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 250W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Tesla P40
2016Why buy it
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌613.3% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 130W.
Radeon Pro 5700
2020Tesla P40
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,900 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 592.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 250W, a 120W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌613.3% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 130W.
Quick Answers
So, is Tesla P40 better than Radeon Pro 5700?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro 5700 make more sense than Tesla P40?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5700 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 56 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 67 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5700 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 215 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 180 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 54 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5700 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 516 FPS | 531 FPS |
| medium | 413 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 258 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 387 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 194 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 133 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5700 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 327 FPS | 473 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 233 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 194 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 374 FPS |
| medium | 233 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 133 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5700 and Tesla P40

Radeon Pro 5700
Radeon Pro 5700
The Radeon Pro 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,469 points.

Tesla P40
Tesla P40
The Tesla P40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1303 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,808 points. Launch price was $5,699.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5700 scores 11,469 and the Tesla P40 reaches 11,808 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Tesla P40 uses Pascal, both on 7 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 3,840 (Tesla P40). Raw compute: 6.221 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 11.76 TFLOPS (Tesla P40). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 1531 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,469 | 11,808+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3840+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.221 TFLOPS | 11.76 TFLOPS+89% |
| Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | 1531 MHz+13% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 144 | 240+67% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 5700 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla P40 has 24 GB. The Tesla P40 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 3 MB (Tesla P40) — the Radeon Pro 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 12.1 (Tesla P40). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 6 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (Tesla P40). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Tesla P40).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | NVENC 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5700 draws 130W versus the Tesla P40's 250W — a 63.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 5700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 500W (Tesla P40). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-48% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+87% | 47.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 5700 launched at $799 MSRP, while the Tesla P40 launched at $5699. The Radeon Pro 5700 costs 86% less ($4900 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.4 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 2.1 (Tesla P40) — the Radeon Pro 5700 offers 585.7% better value. The Radeon Pro 5700 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799-86% | $5699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.4+586% | 2.1 |
| Codename | Navi 10 | GP102 |
| Release | August 4 2020 | September 13 2016 |
| Ranking | #238 | #227 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












