
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 300W, a 170W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅9.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 24.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 300W vs 130W.
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
2020Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 300W, a 170W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅9.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 24.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 300W vs 130W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro 5700 XT better than Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 107 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 24 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 552 FPS |
| medium | 448 FPS | 441 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 280 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 336 FPS | 331 FPS |
| high | 280 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 210 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 224 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 328 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 233 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 194 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 233 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 67 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5700 XT and Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1499 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,442 points.

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,258 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT scores 12,442 and the Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU reaches 12,258 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU). Raw compute: 7.675 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 1499 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,442+2% | 12,258 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3584 ×2+40% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.675 TFLOPS | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2+40% |
| Boost Clock | 1499 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 160 | 224 ×2+40% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: RDNA 1.0 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU). Decoder: Unified Video Decoder 7.0 vs UVD 7.2. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | RDNA 1.0 | VCE 4.1 |
| Decoder | Unified Video Decoder 7.0 | UVD 7.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT draws 130W versus the Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU's 300W — a 79.1% difference. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 500W (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-57% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 95.7+134% | 40.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | — |
| Codename | Navi 10 | Vega 10 |
| Release | August 4 2020 | August 26 2018 |
| Ranking | #215 | #592 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













