
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 580X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $451 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 320.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon Pro 580X
2019Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌302.7% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Radeon Pro 580X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $451 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 320.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌302.7% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than Radeon Pro 580X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 580X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 38 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 204 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 127 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 85 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon Pro 580X

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon Pro 580X
Radeon Pro 580X
The Radeon Pro 580X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 18 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,540 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 and the Radeon Pro 580X reaches 7,540 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro 580X uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 580X). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5.53 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 580X). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+4% | 7,540 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2304+157% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 5.53 TFLOPS+85% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+39% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 144+157% |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+56% | 576 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 580X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 580X has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro 580X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 580X) — the Radeon Pro 580X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro 580X). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 580X). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 580X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro 580X's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 580X). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-50% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+109% | 50.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 580X launched at $600. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 75.2% less ($451 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.6 (Radeon Pro 580X) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 319% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-75% | $600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+319% | 12.6 |
| Codename | TU117 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | March 18 2019 |
| Ranking | #323 | #339 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













