G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 299.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.2 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Radeon Pro 580X

2019

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
300% HIGHER MSRP
$600 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 50.2 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

2012

Radeon Pro 580X

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 299.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.2 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
300% HIGHER MSRP
$600 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 50.2 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro 580X better than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 7,525 vs 7,540 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon Pro 580X is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, FSR upscaling.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro 580X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2012, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 14nm process instead of 28nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon Pro 580X is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon Pro 580X is about 300.0% more expensive on MSRP at $600 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and you are getting 0.2% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1650 Ti really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is GeForce GTX 1650 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 7,525 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro 580X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	Radeon Pro 580X
1080p
low	45 FPS	104 FPS
medium	31 FPS	88 FPS
high	22 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	11 FPS	50 FPS
1440p
low	36 FPS	90 FPS
medium	22 FPS	75 FPS
high	12 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	6 FPS	37 FPS
4K
low	11 FPS	36 FPS
medium	8 FPS	32 FPS
high	4 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	3 FPS	17 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Open Radeon Pro 580X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	Radeon Pro 580X
1080p
low	99 FPS	195 FPS
medium	62 FPS	169 FPS
high	42 FPS	134 FPS
ultra	30 FPS	107 FPS
1440p
low	69 FPS	137 FPS
medium	35 FPS	111 FPS
high	25 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	20 FPS	71 FPS
4K
low	32 FPS	74 FPS
medium	18 FPS	62 FPS
high	14 FPS	51 FPS
ultra	11 FPS	38 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Open Radeon Pro 580X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	Radeon Pro 580X
1080p
low	339 FPS	339 FPS
medium	271 FPS	271 FPS
high	226 FPS	226 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	170 FPS
1440p
low	254 FPS	254 FPS
medium	203 FPS	204 FPS
high	169 FPS	170 FPS
ultra	127 FPS	127 FPS
4K
low	169 FPS	170 FPS
medium	135 FPS	136 FPS
high	113 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	85 FPS	85 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Open Radeon Pro 580X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	Radeon Pro 580X
1080p
low	157 FPS	240 FPS
medium	118 FPS	208 FPS
high	95 FPS	169 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	143 FPS
1440p
low	90 FPS	186 FPS
medium	68 FPS	163 FPS
high	58 FPS	128 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	105 FPS
4K
low	48 FPS	100 FPS
medium	34 FPS	81 FPS
high	29 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	19 FPS	50 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Open Radeon Pro 580X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon Pro 580X

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 9 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 928 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,525 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon Pro 580X

The Radeon Pro 580X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 18 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,540 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti scores 7,525 and the Radeon Pro 580X reaches 7,540 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 580X uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 580X). Raw compute: 1.425 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 5.53 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 580X).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	Radeon Pro 580X
G3D Mark Score	7,525	7,540
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	768	2304+200%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.425 TFLOPS	5.53 TFLOPS+288%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	64	144+125%
L1 Cache	64 KB	576 KB+800%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 580X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	Radeon Pro 580X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 580X has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro 580X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 580X) — the Radeon Pro 580X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	Radeon Pro 580X
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro 580X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	Radeon Pro 580X
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6 (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 580X). Decoder: NVDEC 4 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 580X).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	Radeon Pro 580X
Encoder	NVENC 6 (Volta)	VCE 3.4
Decoder	NVDEC 4	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti draws 50W versus the Radeon Pro 580X's 150W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 580X). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	Radeon Pro 580X
TDP	50W-67%	150W
Recommended PSU	0W-100%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	0mm
Height	0mm	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	75-12%	85°C
Perf/Watt	150.5+199%	50.3

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti launched at $150 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 580X launched at $600. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti costs 75% less ($450 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.2 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 12.6 (Radeon Pro 580X) — the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti offers 298.4% better value. The Radeon Pro 580X is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2012).