Radeon Pro 555 vs Tesla M10

AMD

Radeon Pro 555

2017Core: 850 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

Tesla M10

2016Core: 1033 MHzBoost: 1306 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro 555

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).

Tesla M10

2016

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is Tesla M10 better than Radeon Pro 555?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 3,141 vs 3,173 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Tesla M10 is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro 555 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2017 generation instead of 2016, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 14nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Tesla M10 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $2,500 MSRP. Tesla M10 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Tesla M10 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $2,500 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 1.0% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro 555 is the newer 2017 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (75W vs 225W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Radeon Pro 555 make more sense than Tesla M10?
Yes. Radeon Pro 555 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (75W vs 225W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Tesla M10. The trade-off is that Tesla M10 currently gives you 1.0% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon Pro 555Tesla M10
1080p
low47 FPS30 FPS
medium29 FPS17 FPS
high20 FPS11 FPS
ultra10 FPS5 FPS
1440p
low31 FPS14 FPS
medium19 FPS7 FPS
high10 FPS4 FPS
ultra5 FPS2 FPS
4K
low10 FPS5 FPS
medium7 FPS3 FPS
high4 FPS2 FPS
ultra3 FPS1 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon Pro 555Tesla M10
1080p
low67 FPS82 FPS
medium38 FPS51 FPS
high27 FPS38 FPS
ultra17 FPS24 FPS
1440p
low30 FPS36 FPS
medium18 FPS25 FPS
high12 FPS16 FPS
ultra9 FPS12 FPS
4K
low8 FPS11 FPS
medium6 FPS9 FPS
high5 FPS7 FPS
ultra3 FPS5 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon Pro 555Tesla M10
1080p
low141 FPS143 FPS
medium113 FPS114 FPS
high94 FPS95 FPS
ultra71 FPS71 FPS
1440p
low106 FPS107 FPS
medium85 FPS86 FPS
high71 FPS71 FPS
ultra53 FPS54 FPS
4K
low71 FPS71 FPS
medium57 FPS57 FPS
high47 FPS48 FPS
ultra35 FPS36 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon Pro 555Tesla M10
1080p
low141 FPS143 FPS
medium113 FPS114 FPS
high94 FPS95 FPS
ultra71 FPS71 FPS
1440p
low106 FPS107 FPS
medium85 FPS86 FPS
high71 FPS71 FPS
ultra53 FPS54 FPS
4K
low71 FPS71 FPS
medium55 FPS57 FPS
high44 FPS46 FPS
ultra30 FPS36 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 555 and Tesla M10

AMD

Radeon Pro 555

The Radeon Pro 555 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,141 points.

NVIDIA

Tesla M10

The Tesla M10 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 ×4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,173 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 555 scores 3,141 and the Tesla M10 reaches 3,173 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 555 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Tesla M10 uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon Pro 555) vs 640 (Tesla M10). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 555) vs 1.672 TFLOPS ×4 (Tesla M10).

FeatureRadeon Pro 555Tesla M10
G3D Mark Score
3,141
3,173+1%
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Maxwell
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768+20%
640 ×4
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.306 TFLOPS
1.672 TFLOPS ×4+28%
ROPs
16
16 ×4
TMUs
48+20%
40 ×4
L1 Cache
192 KB
320 KB+67%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro 555Tesla M10
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 555) vs 2 MB (Tesla M10) — the Tesla M10 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro 555Tesla M10
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 555 draws 75W versus the Tesla M10's 225W — a 100% difference. The Radeon Pro 555 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 555) vs 350W (Tesla M10). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon Pro 555Tesla M10
TDP
75W-67%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
41.9+197%
14.1
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro 555 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Tesla M10 launched at $2500. The Radeon Pro 555 costs 100+% less ($2500 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon Pro 555) vs 1.3 (Tesla M10) — the Radeon Pro 555 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Pro 555 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).

FeatureRadeon Pro 555Tesla M10
MSRP
$0-100%
$2500
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
1.3
Codename
Polaris 21
GM107
Release
June 5 2017
May 18 2016
Ranking
#574
#570