
Radeon Pro 555
Popular choices:

Radeon R7 260X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 555
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 115W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 23.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
Radeon R7 260X
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌53.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 75W.
Radeon Pro 555
2017Radeon R7 260X
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 115W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 23.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌53.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R7 260X better than Radeon Pro 555?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro 555 make more sense than Radeon R7 260X?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 555 | Radeon R7 260X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 8 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 31 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 555 | Radeon R7 260X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 18 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 7 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 8 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 555 | Radeon R7 260X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 36 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 555 | Radeon R7 260X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 14 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 555 and Radeon R7 260X

Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 555
The Radeon Pro 555 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,141 points.

Radeon R7 260X
Radeon R7 260X
The Radeon R7 260X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,198 points. Launch price was $139.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 555 scores 3,141 and the Radeon R7 260X reaches 3,198 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 555 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R7 260X uses GCN 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon Pro 555) vs 896 (Radeon R7 260X). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 555) vs 1.971 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 260X).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555 | Radeon R7 260X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,141 | 3,198+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 896+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.306 TFLOPS | 1.971 TFLOPS+51% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 48 | 56+17% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 224 KB+17% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555 | Radeon R7 260X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 555) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 260X) — the Radeon Pro 555 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555 | Radeon R7 260X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 555 draws 75W versus the Radeon R7 260X's 115W — a 42.1% difference. The Radeon Pro 555 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 555) vs 500W (Radeon R7 260X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555 | Radeon R7 260X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-35% | 115W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 170mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 41.9+51% | 27.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 555 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Radeon R7 260X launched at $139. The Radeon Pro 555 costs 100+% less ($139 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon Pro 555) vs 23.0 (Radeon R7 260X) — the Radeon Pro 555 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Pro 555 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555 | Radeon R7 260X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $139 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 23.0 |
| Codename | Polaris 21 | Bonaire |
| Release | June 5 2017 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #574 | #568 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












