Radeon Pro 555 vs Radeon R7 260X

AMD

Radeon Pro 555

2017Core: 850 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon R7 260X

2013Boost: 1000 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro 555

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 75W instead of 115W, a 40W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 23.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $139 MSRP).

Radeon R7 260X

2013

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 53.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon R7 260X better than Radeon Pro 555?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 3,141 vs 3,198 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon R7 260X is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro 555 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2017 generation instead of 2013 and a 14nm process instead of 28nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon R7 260X can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $139 MSRP. Radeon R7 260X is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon R7 260X is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $139 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 1.8% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro 555 is the newer 2017 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (75W vs 115W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Radeon Pro 555 make more sense than Radeon R7 260X?
Yes. Radeon Pro 555 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (75W vs 115W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon R7 260X. The trade-off is that Radeon R7 260X currently gives you 1.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon Pro 555Radeon R7 260X
1080p
low47 FPS36 FPS
medium29 FPS22 FPS
high20 FPS15 FPS
ultra10 FPS8 FPS
1440p
low31 FPS24 FPS
medium19 FPS14 FPS
high10 FPS7 FPS
ultra5 FPS4 FPS
4K
low10 FPS9 FPS
medium7 FPS6 FPS
high4 FPS4 FPS
ultra3 FPS3 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon Pro 555Radeon R7 260X
1080p
low67 FPS54 FPS
medium38 FPS30 FPS
high27 FPS22 FPS
ultra17 FPS15 FPS
1440p
low30 FPS27 FPS
medium18 FPS15 FPS
high12 FPS9 FPS
ultra9 FPS7 FPS
4K
low8 FPS7 FPS
medium6 FPS4 FPS
high5 FPS4 FPS
ultra3 FPS3 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon Pro 555Radeon R7 260X
1080p
low141 FPS144 FPS
medium113 FPS115 FPS
high94 FPS96 FPS
ultra71 FPS72 FPS
1440p
low106 FPS108 FPS
medium85 FPS86 FPS
high71 FPS72 FPS
ultra53 FPS54 FPS
4K
low71 FPS72 FPS
medium57 FPS58 FPS
high47 FPS48 FPS
ultra35 FPS36 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon Pro 555Radeon R7 260X
1080p
low141 FPS111 FPS
medium113 FPS87 FPS
high94 FPS66 FPS
ultra71 FPS51 FPS
1440p
low106 FPS61 FPS
medium85 FPS49 FPS
high71 FPS40 FPS
ultra53 FPS29 FPS
4K
low71 FPS34 FPS
medium55 FPS25 FPS
high44 FPS20 FPS
ultra30 FPS14 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 555 and Radeon R7 260X

AMD

Radeon Pro 555

The Radeon Pro 555 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,141 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 260X

The Radeon R7 260X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,198 points. Launch price was $139.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 555 scores 3,141 and the Radeon R7 260X reaches 3,198 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 555 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R7 260X uses GCN 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon Pro 555) vs 896 (Radeon R7 260X). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 555) vs 1.971 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 260X).

FeatureRadeon Pro 555Radeon R7 260X
G3D Mark Score
3,141
3,198+2%
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GCN 2.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768
896+17%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.306 TFLOPS
1.971 TFLOPS+51%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
48
56+17%
L1 Cache
192 KB
224 KB+17%
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro 555Radeon R7 260X
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 555) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 260X) — the Radeon Pro 555 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro 555Radeon R7 260X
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 555 draws 75W versus the Radeon R7 260X's 115W — a 42.1% difference. The Radeon Pro 555 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 555) vs 500W (Radeon R7 260X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureRadeon Pro 555Radeon R7 260X
TDP
75W-35%
115W
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
170mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
41.9+51%
27.8
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro 555 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Radeon R7 260X launched at $139. The Radeon Pro 555 costs 100+% less ($139 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon Pro 555) vs 23.0 (Radeon R7 260X) — the Radeon Pro 555 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Pro 555 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon Pro 555Radeon R7 260X
MSRP
$0-100%
$139
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
23.0
Codename
Polaris 21
Bonaire
Release
June 5 2017
October 8 2013
Ranking
#574
#568