
Radeon Pro 555
Popular choices:

Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 555
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 132W, a 57W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌76% higher power demand at 132W vs 75W.
Radeon Pro 555
2017Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 132W, a 57W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌76% higher power demand at 132W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U better than Radeon Pro 555?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 555 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 555 | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 31 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 555 | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 18 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 8 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 36 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 555 | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 36 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 555 | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 555 and Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U

Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 555
The Radeon Pro 555 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,141 points.


Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U
The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1626 MHz to 2491 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,206 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 555 scores 3,141 and the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U reaches 3,206 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 555 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon Pro 555) vs 1,792 (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 555) vs 8.928 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555 | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,141 | 3,206+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1792+133% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.306 TFLOPS | 8.928 TFLOPS+584% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 48 | 112+133% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 512 KB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555 | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 555) vs 2 MB (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U) — the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555 | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 555 draws 75W versus the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U's 132W — a 55.1% difference. The Radeon Pro 555 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 555) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555 | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-43% | 132W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Perf/Watt | 41.9+72% | 24.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 555 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U launched at $350. The Radeon Pro 555 costs 100+% less ($350 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon Pro 555) vs 9.2 (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U) — the Radeon Pro 555 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 555 | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $350 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 9.2 |
| Codename | Polaris 21 | Navi 23 |
| Release | June 5 2017 | October 13 2021 |
| Ranking | #574 | #150 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












