G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Why buy it

✅+336.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌271.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 35W.
❌23400% longer card at 235mm vs 1mm.

Radeon Pro 450

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 130W, a 95W reduction.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 235mm, a 234mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,723 vs 11,892).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Radeon Pro 450

2016

Why buy it

✅+336.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 130W, a 95W reduction.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 235mm, a 234mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌271.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 35W.
❌23400% longer card at 235mm vs 1mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,723 vs 11,892).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Radeon Pro 450?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 11,892 vs 2,723 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is a 2022 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon Pro 450 is a 2016 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2016, 336.7% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 2 GB, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $249 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 336.7% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon Pro 450 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro 450 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro 450 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon Pro 450
1080p
low	130 FPS	37 FPS
medium	113 FPS	22 FPS
high	99 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	9 FPS
1440p
low	119 FPS	25 FPS
medium	96 FPS	15 FPS
high	81 FPS	8 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	4 FPS
4K
low	64 FPS	9 FPS
medium	57 FPS	6 FPS
high	39 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	33 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon Pro 450

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon Pro 450
1080p
low	239 FPS	45 FPS
medium	206 FPS	24 FPS
high	164 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	11 FPS
1440p
low	163 FPS	20 FPS
medium	135 FPS	12 FPS
high	112 FPS	8 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	6 FPS
4K
low	88 FPS	6 FPS
medium	74 FPS	4 FPS
high	62 FPS	3 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	2 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon Pro 450

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon Pro 450
1080p
low	535 FPS	123 FPS
medium	428 FPS	98 FPS
high	357 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	61 FPS
1440p
low	401 FPS	92 FPS
medium	321 FPS	74 FPS
high	268 FPS	61 FPS
ultra	201 FPS	46 FPS
4K
low	268 FPS	61 FPS
medium	214 FPS	49 FPS
high	178 FPS	41 FPS
ultra	134 FPS	31 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon Pro 450

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon Pro 450
1080p
low	467 FPS	123 FPS
medium	414 FPS	98 FPS
high	335 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	61 FPS
1440p
low	372 FPS	92 FPS
medium	321 FPS	74 FPS
high	236 FPS	61 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	46 FPS
4K
low	199 FPS	59 FPS
medium	175 FPS	44 FPS
high	150 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	125 FPS	25 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon Pro 450

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon Pro 450

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon Pro 450

The Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,723 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon Pro 450's 2,723 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 336.7%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro 450 uses GCN 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 640 (Radeon Pro 450). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 450).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon Pro 450
G3D Mark Score	11,892+337%	2,723
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 4.0
Process Node	8 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2560+300%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.986 TFLOPS+778%	1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+100%	40
L1 Cache	2.5 MB+1462%	0.16 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 450 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon Pro 450
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 450 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 450) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon Pro 450
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+300%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12_0 (Radeon Pro 450). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon Pro 450
DirectX	12.2+2%	12_0
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 450). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon Pro 450
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCE 3.4
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	UVD 6.3
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon Pro 450's 35W — a 115.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 450). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon Pro 450
TDP	130W	35W-73%
Recommended PSU	450W	350W-22%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	235mm	1mm
Height	124mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	91.5+18%	77.8

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 450 launched at $0. The Radeon Pro 450 costs 100+% less ($249 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro 450) — the Radeon Pro 450 offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).