
Quadro M6000 24GB
Popular choices:

Radeon Instinct MI60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro M6000 24GB
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,001 less on MSRP ($4,999 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 19.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 300W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon Instinct MI60
2018Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro M6000 24GB: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro M6000 24GB is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌20% HIGHER MSRP$6,000 MSRPvs$4,999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 300W vs 250W.
Quadro M6000 24GB
2016Radeon Instinct MI60
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,001 less on MSRP ($4,999 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 19.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 300W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro M6000 24GB: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro M6000 24GB is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌20% HIGHER MSRP$6,000 MSRPvs$4,999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 300W vs 250W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Instinct MI60 better than Quadro M6000 24GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro M6000 24GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro M6000 24GB | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 55 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 30 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro M6000 24GB | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro M6000 24GB | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 418 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 209 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 131 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro M6000 24GB | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 233 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 164 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 68 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M6000 24GB and Radeon Instinct MI60

Quadro M6000 24GB
Quadro M6000 24GB
The Quadro M6000 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 5 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,625 points. Launch price was $4,999.

Radeon Instinct MI60
Radeon Instinct MI60
The Radeon Instinct MI60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2018. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,638 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M6000 24GB scores 11,625 and the Radeon Instinct MI60 reaches 11,638 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M6000 24GB is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Instinct MI60 uses GCN 5.1, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 4,096 (Radeon Instinct MI60). Raw compute: 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 14.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Instinct MI60). Boost clocks: 1114 MHz vs 1800 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,625 | 11,638 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 4096+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.844 TFLOPS | 14.75 TFLOPS+116% |
| Boost Clock | 1114 MHz | 1800 MHz+62% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 256 | 256 |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB+10% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M6000 24GB comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Instinct MI60 has 8 GB. The Quadro M6000 24GB offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 4 MB (Radeon Instinct MI60) — the Radeon Instinct MI60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+200% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12/1 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 12.1 (Radeon Instinct MI60). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12/1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs VCE 4.1 (Radeon Instinct MI60). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs UVD 7.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Instinct MI60).
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | VCE 4.1 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | UVD 7.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M6000 24GB draws 250W versus the Radeon Instinct MI60's 300W — a 18.2% difference. The Quadro M6000 24GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 500W (Radeon Instinct MI60). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-17% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 46.5+20% | 38.8 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M6000 24GB launched at $4999 MSRP, while the Radeon Instinct MI60 launched at $6000. The Quadro M6000 24GB costs 16.7% less ($1001 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.3 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 1.9 (Radeon Instinct MI60) — the Quadro M6000 24GB offers 21.1% better value. The Radeon Instinct MI60 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4999-17% | $6000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.3+21% | 1.9 |
| Codename | GM200 | Vega 20 |
| Release | March 5 2016 | November 18 2018 |
| Ranking | #233 | #232 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













