
Radeon E6760
Popular choices:

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon E6760
2011Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 295W, a 250W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌101.7% HIGHER MSRP$240 MSRPvs$119 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.5 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($240 MSRP vs $119 MSRP).
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $121 less on MSRP ($119 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 98.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.0 vs 3.5 G3D/$ ($119 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌555.6% higher power demand at 295W vs 45W.
Radeon E6760
2011Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 295W, a 250W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $121 less on MSRP ($119 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 98.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.0 vs 3.5 G3D/$ ($119 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌101.7% HIGHER MSRP$240 MSRPvs$119 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.5 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($240 MSRP vs $119 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌555.6% higher power demand at 295W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon E6760 better than Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 make more sense than Radeon E6760?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon E6760 | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 19 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 12 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 13 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 9 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon E6760 | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 13 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 9 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 9 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 1 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon E6760 | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 9 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon E6760 | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 9 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon E6760 and Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

Radeon E6760
Radeon E6760
The Radeon E6760 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 850 points. Launch price was $239.99.

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 837 points. Launch price was $3,999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon E6760 scores 850 and the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 reaches 837 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon E6760 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon E6760) vs 6,144 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600).
| Feature | Radeon E6760 | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 850+2% | 837 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 6144+1180% |
| ROPs | 8 | 192+2300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 384+1500% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon E6760 | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon E6760 | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon E6760 draws 45W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600's 295W — a 147.1% difference. The Radeon E6760 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon E6760) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon E6760 | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-85% | 295W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 18.9+575% | 2.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon E6760 launched at $240 MSRP, while the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 launched at $119. The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 costs 50.4% less ($121 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.5 (Radeon E6760) vs 7.0 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) — the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 offers 100% better value. The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon E6760 | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $240 | $119-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.5 | 7.0+100% |
| Codename | Turks | Navi 31 |
| Release | May 2 2011 | April 13 2023 |
| Ranking | #923 | #26 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











