
Radeon E6760
Popular choices:

Radeon R5 M435
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon E6760
2011Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 75W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌60% HIGHER MSRP$240 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.5 vs 5.7 G3D/$ ($240 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Radeon R5 M435
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $90 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 61.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.7 vs 3.5 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 45W.
Radeon E6760
2011Radeon R5 M435
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 75W, a 30W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $90 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 61.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.7 vs 3.5 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌60% HIGHER MSRP$240 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.5 vs 5.7 G3D/$ ($240 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R5 M435 better than Radeon E6760?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon E6760 make more sense than Radeon R5 M435?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon E6760 | Radeon R5 M435 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 19 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 12 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 13 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon E6760 | Radeon R5 M435 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 13 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 9 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 9 FPS | 8 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon E6760 | Radeon R5 M435 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 10 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon E6760 | Radeon R5 M435 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 19 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 1 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon E6760 and Radeon R5 M435

Radeon E6760
Radeon E6760
The Radeon E6760 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 850 points. Launch price was $239.99.

Radeon R5 M435
Radeon R5 M435
The Radeon R5 M435 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 860 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon E6760 scores 850 and the Radeon R5 M435 reaches 860 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon E6760 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R5 M435 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon E6760) vs 320 (Radeon R5 M435).
| Feature | Radeon E6760 | Radeon R5 M435 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 850 | 860+1% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480+50% | 320 |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24+20% | 20 |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon E6760 | Radeon R5 M435 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon E6760 | Radeon R5 M435 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon E6760 draws 45W versus the Radeon R5 M435's 75W — a 50% difference. The Radeon E6760 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon E6760) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M435). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon E6760 | Radeon R5 M435 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-40% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Perf/Watt | 18.9+64% | 11.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon E6760 launched at $240 MSRP, while the Radeon R5 M435 launched at $150. The Radeon R5 M435 costs 37.5% less ($90 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.5 (Radeon E6760) vs 5.7 (Radeon R5 M435) — the Radeon R5 M435 offers 62.9% better value. The Radeon R5 M435 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon E6760 | Radeon R5 M435 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $240 | $150-38% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.5 | 5.7+63% |
| Codename | Turks | Jet |
| Release | May 2 2011 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #923 | #922 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











