
Radeon E6760
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 4830
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon E6760
2011Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌84.6% HIGHER MSRP$240 MSRPvs$130 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.5 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($240 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
Radeon HD 4830
2008Why buy it
- ✅Costs $110 less on MSRP ($130 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 88.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.7 vs 3.5 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2008-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.
Radeon E6760
2011Radeon HD 4830
2008Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $110 less on MSRP ($130 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 88.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.7 vs 3.5 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌84.6% HIGHER MSRP$240 MSRPvs$130 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.5 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($240 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2008-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon HD 4830 better than Radeon E6760?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon E6760 make more sense than Radeon HD 4830?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon E6760 | Radeon HD 4830 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 19 FPS | 17 FPS |
| medium | 12 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 13 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon E6760 | Radeon HD 4830 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 13 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 9 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 9 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 1 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon E6760 | Radeon HD 4830 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 10 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon E6760 | Radeon HD 4830 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 19 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 1 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon E6760 and Radeon HD 4830

Radeon E6760
Radeon E6760
The Radeon E6760 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 850 points. Launch price was $239.99.

Radeon HD 4830
Radeon HD 4830
The Radeon HD 4830 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 21 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 575 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 866 points. Launch price was $130.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon E6760 scores 850 and the Radeon HD 4830 reaches 866 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon E6760 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 4830 uses TeraScale, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon E6760) vs 640 (Radeon HD 4830).
| Feature | Radeon E6760 | Radeon HD 4830 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 850 | 866+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 640+33% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon E6760 | Radeon HD 4830 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon E6760 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4830 has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 4830 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon E6760 | Radeon HD 4830 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon E6760 draws 45W versus the Radeon HD 4830's 95W — a 71.4% difference. The Radeon E6760 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon E6760) vs 450W (Radeon HD 4830). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon E6760 | Radeon HD 4830 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-53% | 95W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-33% | 450W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 246mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 18.9+108% | 9.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon E6760 launched at $240 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 4830 launched at $130. The Radeon HD 4830 costs 45.8% less ($110 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.5 (Radeon E6760) vs 6.7 (Radeon HD 4830) — the Radeon HD 4830 offers 91.4% better value. The Radeon E6760 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon E6760 | Radeon HD 4830 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $240 | $130-46% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.5 | 6.7+91% |
| Codename | Turks | RV770 |
| Release | May 2 2011 | October 21 2008 |
| Ranking | #923 | #920 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











