
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Popular choices:

Radeon AI PRO R9700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $399 less on MSRP ($900 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 51.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.3 vs 22.0 G3D/$ ($900 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 300W, a 190W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon AI PRO R9700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Radeon AI PRO R9700
2025Why buy it
- ✅36.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌44.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,299 MSRPvs$900 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 22.0 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($1,299 MSRP vs $900 MSRP).
- ❌172.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 110W.
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
2019Radeon AI PRO R9700
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $399 less on MSRP ($900 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 51.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.3 vs 22.0 G3D/$ ($900 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 300W, a 190W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅36.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon AI PRO R9700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌44.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,299 MSRPvs$900 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 22.0 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($1,299 MSRP vs $900 MSRP).
- ❌172.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 110W.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) better than Radeon AI PRO R9700?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon AI PRO R9700 make more sense than Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 256 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 351 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 281 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 195 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 113 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 121 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 745 FPS | 911 FPS |
| medium | 615 FPS | 755 FPS |
| high | 547 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 477 FPS | 574 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 701 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 576 FPS |
| high | 420 FPS | 501 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 421 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 388 FPS | 492 FPS |
| medium | 312 FPS | 406 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 348 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 284 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 812 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 706 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 636 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 558 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 639 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 426 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 376 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 297 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) and Radeon AI PRO R9700

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,964 points.

Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,589 points. Launch price was $1,299.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) scores 29,964 and the Radeon AI PRO R9700 reaches 28,589 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 uses RDNA 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 4,096 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Raw compute: 7.987 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 2920 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 64 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) with 320 Tensor cores vs 128.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 29,964+5% | 28,589 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4096+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.987 TFLOPS | 47.84 TFLOPS+499% |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 2920 MHz+87% |
| ROPs | 64 | 128+100% |
| TMUs | 160 | 256+60% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 64+60% |
| Tensor Cores | 320+150% | 128 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 has 32 GB. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 8 MB (Radeon AI PRO R9700) — the Radeon AI PRO R9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 32 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 12.2 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs VCN 5.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 5.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon AI PRO R9700).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | VCN 5.0 |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | VCN 5.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) draws 110W versus the Radeon AI PRO R9700's 300W — a 92.7% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 650W (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W-63% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 272.4+186% | 95.3 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) launched at $900 MSRP, while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 launched at $1299. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) costs 30.7% less ($399 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 33.3 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 22.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) — the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) offers 51.4% better value. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $900-31% | $1299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.3+51% | 22.0 |
| Codename | TU104 | Navi 48 |
| Release | May 27 2019 | July 23 2025 |
| Ranking | #201 | #23 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












