
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Popular choices:

Radeon AI PRO R9700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅13.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 127.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.0 vs 22.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 220W instead of 300W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon AI PRO R9700
2025Why buy it
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌116.9% HIGHER MSRP$1,299 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 22.0 vs 50.0 G3D/$ ($1,299 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌36.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 220W.
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
2024Radeon AI PRO R9700
2025Why buy it
- ✅13.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 127.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.0 vs 22.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 220W instead of 300W, a 80W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌116.9% HIGHER MSRP$1,299 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 22.0 vs 50.0 G3D/$ ($1,299 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌36.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 220W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER better than Radeon AI PRO R9700?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon AI PRO R9700 make more sense than GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 477 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 368 FPS | 351 FPS |
| ultra | 317 FPS | 281 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 327 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 121 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 911 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 755 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 574 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 701 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 576 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 501 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 421 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 492 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 406 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 348 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 284 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 857 FPS | 812 FPS |
| medium | 711 FPS | 706 FPS |
| high | 646 FPS | 636 FPS |
| ultra | 590 FPS | 558 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 695 FPS | 639 FPS |
| medium | 576 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 507 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 455 FPS | 426 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 402 FPS | 376 FPS |
| high | 361 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 297 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and Radeon AI PRO R9700

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1980 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,958 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,589 points. Launch price was $1,299.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER scores 29,958 and the Radeon AI PRO R9700 reaches 28,589 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 uses RDNA 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 7,168 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 4,096 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Raw compute: 35.48 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2920 MHz. Ray tracing: 56 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 64 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) with 224 Tensor cores vs 128.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 29,958+5% | 28,589 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 4.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 7168+75% | 4096 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 35.48 TFLOPS | 47.84 TFLOPS+35% |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz | 2920 MHz+18% |
| ROPs | 80 | 128+60% |
| TMUs | 224 | 256+14% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+500% | 8 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 56 | 64+14% |
| Tensor Cores | 224+75% | 128 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 has 32 GB. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 8 MB (Radeon AI PRO R9700) — the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 32 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+500% | 8 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 12.2 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs VCN 5.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 5.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon AI PRO R9700).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | VCN 5.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 5.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER draws 220W versus the Radeon AI PRO R9700's 300W — a 30.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 650W (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 245mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-27% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 245mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 136.2+43% | 95.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER launched at $599 MSRP, while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 launched at $1299. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER costs 53.9% less ($700 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.0 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 22.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) — the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER offers 127.3% better value. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2024).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-54% | $1299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.0+127% | 22.0 |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 48 |
| Release | January 8 2024 | July 23 2025 |
| Ranking | #18 | #23 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












