
Radeon 780M
Popular choices:

Tesla M60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon 780M
2024Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 300W, a 285W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
Tesla M60
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1900% higher power demand at 300W vs 15W.
Radeon 780M
2024Tesla M60
2015Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 300W, a 285W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1900% higher power demand at 300W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Tesla M60 better than Radeon 780M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon 780M make more sense than Tesla M60?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon 780M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon 780M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 35 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 32 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon 780M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 310 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 79 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon 780M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 780M and Tesla M60

Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M
The Radeon 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,906 points.

Tesla M60
Tesla M60
The Tesla M60 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,002 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 780M scores 6,906 and the Tesla M60 reaches 7,002 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 780M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Tesla M60 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon 780M) vs 2,048 (Tesla M60). Raw compute: 8.909 TFLOPS (Radeon 780M) vs 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla M60). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 780M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,906 | 7,002+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2048 ×2+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.909 TFLOPS+85% | 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+146% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64 ×2+100% |
| TMUs | 48 | 128 ×2+167% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 780M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon 780M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 780M) vs 12.1 (Tesla M60). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon 780M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon 780M) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M60). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 780M) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Tesla M60).
| Feature | Radeon 780M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC 2.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | PureVideo HD VP6 (2x) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 780M draws 15W versus the Tesla M60's 300W — a 181% difference. The Radeon 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 780M) vs 350W (Tesla M60). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon 780M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-95% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 460.4+1876% | 23.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 780M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon 780M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $3000 |
| Codename | Phoenix | GM204 |
| Release | January 31 2024 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #359 | #355 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












