Radeon 780M vs Radeon Pro 5500M

AMD

Radeon 780M

2024Core: 800 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon Pro 5500M

2019Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1450 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon 780M

2024

Why buy it

  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 85W, a 70W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 5500M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon Pro 5500M

2019

Why buy it

  • 31.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon 780M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
  • 466.7% higher power demand at 85W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon 780M better than Radeon Pro 5500M?
Yes. Radeon 780M is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 2.6% higher PassMark G3D performance. It also comes from 2024 instead of 2019, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 780M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2019, 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware, and a 4nm process instead of 7nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon 780M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.6% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon 780M is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Radeon Pro 5500M still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.
Is Radeon Pro 5500M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. Radeon Pro 5500M is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to an unclear MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, Radeon 780M earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon 780MRadeon Pro 5500M
1080p
low93 FPS101 FPS
medium78 FPS87 FPS
high65 FPS71 FPS
ultra43 FPS47 FPS
1440p
low80 FPS90 FPS
medium68 FPS76 FPS
high51 FPS55 FPS
ultra32 FPS36 FPS
4K
low29 FPS37 FPS
medium27 FPS34 FPS
high18 FPS21 FPS
ultra16 FPS17 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon 780MRadeon Pro 5500M
1080p
low96 FPS119 FPS
medium67 FPS87 FPS
high47 FPS59 FPS
ultra32 FPS40 FPS
1440p
low67 FPS81 FPS
medium45 FPS51 FPS
high33 FPS37 FPS
ultra23 FPS27 FPS
4K
low35 FPS39 FPS
medium25 FPS28 FPS
high20 FPS22 FPS
ultra13 FPS16 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon 780MRadeon Pro 5500M
1080p
low310 FPS303 FPS
medium249 FPS242 FPS
high206 FPS202 FPS
ultra155 FPS151 FPS
1440p
low227 FPS227 FPS
medium186 FPS182 FPS
high155 FPS151 FPS
ultra117 FPS114 FPS
4K
low137 FPS151 FPS
medium123 FPS121 FPS
high83 FPS101 FPS
ultra59 FPS76 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon 780MRadeon Pro 5500M
1080p
low173 FPS216 FPS
medium136 FPS187 FPS
high112 FPS154 FPS
ultra88 FPS128 FPS
1440p
low119 FPS167 FPS
medium96 FPS147 FPS
high81 FPS116 FPS
ultra65 FPS94 FPS
4K
low71 FPS91 FPS
medium57 FPS74 FPS
high45 FPS60 FPS
ultra33 FPS47 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 780M and Radeon Pro 5500M

AMD

Radeon 780M

The Radeon 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,906 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro 5500M

The Radeon Pro 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,730 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 780M scores 6,906 and the Radeon Pro 5500M reaches 6,730 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 780M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon Pro 5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon 780M) vs 1,536 (Radeon Pro 5500M). Raw compute: 8.909 TFLOPS (Radeon 780M) vs 4.454 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5500M). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1450 MHz.

FeatureRadeon 780MRadeon Pro 5500M
G3D Mark Score
6,906+3%
6,730
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
4 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
768
1536+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.909 TFLOPS+100%
4.454 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2900 MHz+100%
1450 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
48
96+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling + RSR
FSR upscaling + RSR

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 780MRadeon Pro 5500M
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon 780M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5500M has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro 5500M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

FeatureRadeon 780MRadeon Pro 5500M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
8 GB+100%
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR6
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 780M) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5500M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon 780MRadeon Pro 5500M
DirectX
12.2+2%
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon 780M) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5500M). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 780M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5500M).

FeatureRadeon 780MRadeon Pro 5500M
Encoder
VCN 4.0
VCN 2.0
Decoder
VCN 4.0
VCN 2.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
H.264,H.265,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 780M draws 15W versus the Radeon Pro 5500M's 85W — a 140% difference. The Radeon 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 780M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5500M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureRadeon 780MRadeon Pro 5500M
TDP
15W-82%
85W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
460.4+481%
79.2