
Radeon 780M
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5500M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon 780M
2024Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 85W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 5500M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro 5500M
2019Why buy it
- ✅31.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon 780M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌466.7% higher power demand at 85W vs 15W.
Radeon 780M
2024Radeon Pro 5500M
2019Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 85W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅31.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 5500M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon 780M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌466.7% higher power demand at 85W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon 780M better than Radeon Pro 5500M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 5500M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon 780M | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon 780M | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 35 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 16 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon 780M | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 310 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 76 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon 780M | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 47 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 780M and Radeon Pro 5500M

Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M
The Radeon 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,906 points.

Radeon Pro 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M
The Radeon Pro 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,730 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 780M scores 6,906 and the Radeon Pro 5500M reaches 6,730 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 780M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon Pro 5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon 780M) vs 1,536 (Radeon Pro 5500M). Raw compute: 8.909 TFLOPS (Radeon 780M) vs 4.454 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5500M). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1450 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 780M | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,906+3% | 6,730 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1536+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.909 TFLOPS+100% | 4.454 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+100% | 1450 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 96+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 780M | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 780M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5500M has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro 5500M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon 780M | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 780M) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5500M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon 780M | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon 780M) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5500M). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 780M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5500M).
| Feature | Radeon 780M | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 780M draws 15W versus the Radeon Pro 5500M's 85W — a 140% difference. The Radeon 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 780M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5500M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon 780M | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-82% | 85W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 460.4+481% | 79.2 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












