
GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
Popular choices:

Radeon 780M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌440% higher power demand at 81W vs 15W.
Radeon 780M
2024Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 81W, a 66W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
2014Radeon 780M
2024Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 81W, a 66W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌440% higher power demand at 81W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon 780M better than GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 113 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 13 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 302 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 241 FPS | 249 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 59 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 33 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE and Radeon 780M

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 81W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,707 points. Launch price was $2,560.89.

Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M
The Radeon 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,906 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE scores 6,707 and the Radeon 780M reaches 6,906 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon 780M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 768 (Radeon 780M). Raw compute: 2.657 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 8.909 TFLOPS (Radeon 780M). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 2900 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,707 | 6,906+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+67% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.657 TFLOPS | 8.909 TFLOPS+235% |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 2900 MHz+179% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 80+67% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 480 KB+88% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 780M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 192-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 2 MB (Radeon 780M) — the Radeon 780M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 120 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 12.2 (Radeon 780M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 780M). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 780M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 1st Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE draws 81W versus the Radeon 780M's 15W — a 137.5% difference. The Radeon 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 350W (Radeon 780M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 81W | 15W-81% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 82.8 | 460.4+456% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












