
GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 81W instead of 120W, a 39W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 41.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Radeon RX 570
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 41.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌48.1% higher power demand at 120W vs 81W.
GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
2014Radeon RX 570
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 81W instead of 120W, a 39W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 41.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 41.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌48.1% higher power demand at 120W vs 81W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 570 better than GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 16 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 302 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 241 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 78 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 33 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE and Radeon RX 570

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 81W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,707 points. Launch price was $2,560.89.

Radeon RX 570
Radeon RX 570
The Radeon RX 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1168 MHz to 1244 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,967 points. Launch price was $169.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE scores 6,707 and the Radeon RX 570 reaches 6,967 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 570). Raw compute: 2.657 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 5.095 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 570). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1244 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,707 | 6,967+4% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2048+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.657 TFLOPS | 5.095 TFLOPS+92% |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 1244 MHz+20% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L1 Cache | 480 KB | 512 KB+7% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 570 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 570 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 120 GB/s (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 570) — a 86.7% advantage for the Radeon RX 570. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 570) — the Radeon RX 570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 120 GB/s | 224 GB/s+87% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 12 (Radeon RX 570). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 5.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 5+25% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 570). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs H.265,H.264 (Radeon RX 570).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | 1st Gen NVDEC | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.265,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE draws 81W versus the Radeon RX 570's 120W — a 38.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 450W (Radeon RX 570). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 81W-33% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 82.8+43% | 58.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 570 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $169 |
| Codename | GM204 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | October 7 2014 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #408 | #356 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












