
Radeon 780M
Popular choices:

RadeonT 780M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon 780M
2024Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RadeonT 780M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
RadeonT 780M
2024Why buy it
- ✅0.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon 780M
2024RadeonT 780M
2024Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅0.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RadeonT 780M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is RadeonT 780M better than Radeon 780M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon 780M make more sense than RadeonT 780M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon 780M | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon 780M | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 35 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon 780M | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 310 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 256 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 59 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon 780M | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 780M and RadeonT 780M

Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M
The Radeon 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,906 points.

RadeonT 780M
RadeonT 780M
The RadeonT 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,098 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 780M scores 6,906 and the RadeonT 780M reaches 7,098 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 780M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RadeonT 780M uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 4 nm process. Shader units: 768 (Radeon 780M) vs 768 (RadeonT 780M). Raw compute: 8.909 TFLOPS (Radeon 780M) vs 8.909 TFLOPS (RadeonT 780M). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 12 RT cores (Radeon 780M) vs 12 (RadeonT 780M).
| Feature | Radeon 780M | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,906 | 7,098+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.909 TFLOPS | 8.909 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz | 2900 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + RSR |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 12 | 12 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 780M | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon 780M | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 780M) vs 12.2 (RadeonT 780M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon 780M | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon 780M) vs VCN 4.0 (RadeonT 780M). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 780M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RadeonT 780M).
| Feature | Radeon 780M | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 780M draws 15W versus the RadeonT 780M's 15W — a 0% difference. The RadeonT 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 780M) vs 350W (RadeonT 780M). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon 780M | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W | 15W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | None |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 460.4 | 473.2+3% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












