Radeon 780M vs RadeonT 780M

AMD

Radeon 780M

2024Core: 800 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

RadeonT 780M

2024Core: 800 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon 780M

2024

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than RadeonT 780M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

RadeonT 780M

2024

Why buy it

  • 0.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

So, is RadeonT 780M better than Radeon 780M?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. RadeonT 780M averages 0.7% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 6,906 vs 7,098 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer RadeonT 780M is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 780M is the safer long-term GPU choice because it gives you the stronger overall hardware and feature outlook for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
RadeonT 780M can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. RadeonT 780M is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. RadeonT 780M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 0.7% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.8% higher G3D Mark. Radeon 780M is the more forward-looking alternative, so it still has a real case if you care more about future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Radeon 780M make more sense than RadeonT 780M?
Yes. Radeon 780M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of RadeonT 780M. The trade-off is that RadeonT 780M currently gives you 2.8% higher G3D Mark and 0.7% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon 780MRadeonT 780M
1080p
low93 FPS93 FPS
medium78 FPS78 FPS
high65 FPS65 FPS
ultra43 FPS43 FPS
1440p
low80 FPS80 FPS
medium68 FPS68 FPS
high51 FPS51 FPS
ultra32 FPS32 FPS
4K
low29 FPS29 FPS
medium27 FPS27 FPS
high18 FPS18 FPS
ultra16 FPS16 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon 780MRadeonT 780M
1080p
low96 FPS96 FPS
medium67 FPS67 FPS
high47 FPS47 FPS
ultra32 FPS32 FPS
1440p
low67 FPS67 FPS
medium45 FPS45 FPS
high33 FPS33 FPS
ultra23 FPS23 FPS
4K
low35 FPS35 FPS
medium25 FPS25 FPS
high20 FPS20 FPS
ultra13 FPS13 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon 780MRadeonT 780M
1080p
low310 FPS310 FPS
medium249 FPS256 FPS
high206 FPS206 FPS
ultra155 FPS160 FPS
1440p
low227 FPS227 FPS
medium186 FPS192 FPS
high155 FPS157 FPS
ultra117 FPS120 FPS
4K
low137 FPS137 FPS
medium123 FPS123 FPS
high83 FPS83 FPS
ultra59 FPS59 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon 780MRadeonT 780M
1080p
low173 FPS172 FPS
medium136 FPS135 FPS
high112 FPS112 FPS
ultra88 FPS88 FPS
1440p
low119 FPS118 FPS
medium96 FPS96 FPS
high81 FPS81 FPS
ultra65 FPS64 FPS
4K
low71 FPS71 FPS
medium57 FPS56 FPS
high45 FPS44 FPS
ultra33 FPS33 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 780M and RadeonT 780M

AMD

Radeon 780M

The Radeon 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,906 points.

AMD

RadeonT 780M

The RadeonT 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,098 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 780M scores 6,906 and the RadeonT 780M reaches 7,098 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 780M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RadeonT 780M uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 4 nm process. Shader units: 768 (Radeon 780M) vs 768 (RadeonT 780M). Raw compute: 8.909 TFLOPS (Radeon 780M) vs 8.909 TFLOPS (RadeonT 780M). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 12 RT cores (Radeon 780M) vs 12 (RadeonT 780M).

FeatureRadeon 780MRadeonT 780M
G3D Mark Score
6,906
7,098+3%
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
4 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
768
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.909 TFLOPS
8.909 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2900 MHz
2900 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
48
48
L1 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling + RSR
FSR upscaling + RSR
Ray Tracing Cores
12
12

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 780MRadeonT 780M
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

FeatureRadeon 780MRadeonT 780M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR6
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 780M) vs 12.2 (RadeonT 780M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon 780MRadeonT 780M
DirectX
12.2
12.2
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon 780M) vs VCN 4.0 (RadeonT 780M). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 780M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RadeonT 780M).

FeatureRadeon 780MRadeonT 780M
Encoder
VCN 4.0
VCN 4.0
Decoder
VCN 4.0
VCN 4.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 780M draws 15W versus the RadeonT 780M's 15W — a 0% difference. The RadeonT 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 780M) vs 350W (RadeonT 780M). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureRadeon 780MRadeonT 780M
TDP
15W
15W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
None
None
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Perf/Watt
460.4
473.2+3%