
Radeon 680M
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M390X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon 680M
2023Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $550 MSRP).
Radeon R9 M390X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($550 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
Radeon 680M
2023Radeon R9 M390X
2015Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($550 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $550 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 M390X better than Radeon 680M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon 680M make more sense than Radeon R9 M390X?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon 680M | Radeon R9 M390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon 680M | Radeon R9 M390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 107 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 21 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 54 FPS | 22 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon 680M | Radeon R9 M390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 44 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon 680M | Radeon R9 M390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 680M and Radeon R9 M390X

Radeon 680M
Radeon 680M
The Radeon 680M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,836 points.

Radeon R9 M390X
Radeon R9 M390X
The Radeon R9 M390X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,895 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 680M scores 3,836 and the Radeon R9 M390X reaches 3,895 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 680M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon R9 M390X uses GCN 3.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon 680M) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M390X). Raw compute: 3.379 TFLOPS (Radeon 680M) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M390X).
| Feature | Radeon 680M | Radeon R9 M390X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,836 | 3,895+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2048+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.379 TFLOPS+14% | 2.961 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 128+167% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 680M | Radeon R9 M390X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 680M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M390X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M390X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 680M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M390X) — the Radeon 680M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 680M | Radeon R9 M390X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 160 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 680M draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 M390X's 75W — a 40% difference. The Radeon 680M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 680M) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M390X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon 680M | Radeon R9 M390X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-33% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 76.7+48% | 51.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 680M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon 680M | Radeon R9 M390X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $550 |
| Codename | Rembrandt+ | Amethyst |
| Release | January 3 2023 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #512 | #504 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












