Radeon 680M vs Radeon R9 M390X

AMD

Radeon 680M

2023Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2200 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M390X

2015Core: 723 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon 680M

2023

Why buy it

  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $550 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M390X

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($550 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon R9 M390X better than Radeon 680M?
Yes. Radeon R9 M390X is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 3,895 vs 3,836 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon R9 M390X is a 2015 card with FSR upscaling, while Radeon 680M is a 2023 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 680M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2015, 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware, and a 6nm process instead of 28nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon R9 M390X can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $550 MSRP. Radeon R9 M390X is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon R9 M390X is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $550 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 1.5% higher G3D Mark. Radeon 680M is the newer 2023 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 75W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Radeon 680M make more sense than Radeon R9 M390X?
Yes. Radeon 680M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 75W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon R9 M390X. The trade-off is that Radeon R9 M390X currently gives you 1.5% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon 680MRadeon R9 M390X
1080p
low127 FPS81 FPS
medium113 FPS69 FPS
high94 FPS57 FPS
ultra70 FPS37 FPS
1440p
low111 FPS71 FPS
medium93 FPS62 FPS
high76 FPS45 FPS
ultra57 FPS29 FPS
4K
low47 FPS26 FPS
medium44 FPS24 FPS
high32 FPS16 FPS
ultra28 FPS14 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon 680MRadeon R9 M390X
1080p
low161 FPS91 FPS
medium128 FPS69 FPS
high95 FPS57 FPS
ultra63 FPS40 FPS
1440p
low107 FPS54 FPS
medium82 FPS38 FPS
high62 FPS29 FPS
ultra45 FPS21 FPS
4K
low54 FPS22 FPS
medium43 FPS16 FPS
high34 FPS12 FPS
ultra22 FPS9 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon 680MRadeon R9 M390X
1080p
low173 FPS175 FPS
medium138 FPS140 FPS
high115 FPS117 FPS
ultra86 FPS88 FPS
1440p
low129 FPS131 FPS
medium104 FPS105 FPS
high86 FPS88 FPS
ultra65 FPS66 FPS
4K
low86 FPS88 FPS
medium69 FPS70 FPS
high58 FPS58 FPS
ultra43 FPS44 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon 680MRadeon R9 M390X
1080p
low173 FPS172 FPS
medium138 FPS140 FPS
high115 FPS117 FPS
ultra86 FPS88 FPS
1440p
low129 FPS122 FPS
medium104 FPS102 FPS
high86 FPS88 FPS
ultra65 FPS66 FPS
4K
low86 FPS72 FPS
medium69 FPS56 FPS
high58 FPS45 FPS
ultra43 FPS30 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 680M and Radeon R9 M390X

AMD

Radeon 680M

The Radeon 680M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,836 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M390X

The Radeon R9 M390X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,895 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 680M scores 3,836 and the Radeon R9 M390X reaches 3,895 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 680M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon R9 M390X uses GCN 3.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon 680M) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M390X). Raw compute: 3.379 TFLOPS (Radeon 680M) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M390X).

FeatureRadeon 680MRadeon R9 M390X
G3D Mark Score
3,836
3,895+2%
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
6 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768
2048+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.379 TFLOPS+14%
2.961 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
48
128+167%
L1 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling + RSR
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 680MRadeon R9 M390X
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon 680M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M390X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M390X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 680M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M390X) — the Radeon 680M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon 680MRadeon R9 M390X
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
160 GB/s
Bus Width
System
256-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 680M draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 M390X's 75W — a 40% difference. The Radeon 680M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 680M) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M390X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureRadeon 680MRadeon R9 M390X
TDP
50W-33%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
76.7+48%
51.9
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon 680M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon 680MRadeon R9 M390X
MSRP
$550
Codename
Rembrandt+
Amethyst
Release
January 3 2023
May 5 2015
Ranking
#512
#504