
Radeon 680M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7850
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon 680M
2023Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 130W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 210mm, a 209mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Radeon HD 7850
2012Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌160% higher power demand at 130W vs 50W.
- ❌20900% longer card at 210mm vs 1mm.
Radeon 680M
2023Radeon HD 7850
2012Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 130W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 210mm, a 209mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌160% higher power demand at 130W vs 50W.
- ❌20900% longer card at 210mm vs 1mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon HD 7850 better than Radeon 680M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon 680M make more sense than Radeon HD 7850?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon 680M | Radeon HD 7850 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 44 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon 680M | Radeon HD 7850 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 107 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 54 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon 680M | Radeon HD 7850 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 44 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon 680M | Radeon HD 7850 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 34 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 24 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 680M and Radeon HD 7850

Radeon 680M
Radeon 680M
The Radeon 680M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,836 points.

Radeon HD 7850
Radeon HD 7850
The Radeon HD 7850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,897 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 680M scores 3,836 and the Radeon HD 7850 reaches 3,897 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 680M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon HD 7850 uses GCN 1.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon 680M) vs 1,024 (Radeon HD 7850). Raw compute: 3.379 TFLOPS (Radeon 680M) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7850). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 680M | Radeon HD 7850 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,836 | 3,897+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1024+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.379 TFLOPS+92% | 1.761 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2200 MHz+120% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 64+33% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 680M | Radeon HD 7850 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 680M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 7850) — the Radeon 680M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 680M | Radeon HD 7850 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 153.6 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_2 (Radeon 680M) vs 12 (Radeon HD 7850). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon 680M | Radeon HD 7850 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.1 (Radeon 680M) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7850). Decoder: VCN 3.1 vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | Radeon 680M | Radeon HD 7850 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.1 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 3.1 | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | — | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 680M draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 7850's 130W — a 88.9% difference. The Radeon 680M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 680M) vs 500W (Radeon HD 7850). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 210mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon 680M | Radeon HD 7850 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-62% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 210mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 76.7+156% | 30.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 680M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon 680M | Radeon HD 7850 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $249 |
| Codename | Rembrandt+ | Pitcairn |
| Release | January 3 2023 | March 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #512 | #503 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












