
Radeon 680M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 8970M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon 680M
2023Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon HD 8970M
2013Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.
Radeon 680M
2023Radeon HD 8970M
2013Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon HD 8970M better than Radeon 680M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon 680M make more sense than Radeon HD 8970M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon 680M | Radeon HD 8970M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon 680M | Radeon HD 8970M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 107 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 54 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 19 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon 680M | Radeon HD 8970M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 44 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon 680M | Radeon HD 8970M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 25 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 680M and Radeon HD 8970M

Radeon 680M
Radeon 680M
The Radeon 680M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,836 points.

Radeon HD 8970M
Radeon HD 8970M
The Radeon HD 8970M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 14 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,876 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 680M scores 3,836 and the Radeon HD 8970M reaches 3,876 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 680M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8970M uses GCN 1.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon 680M) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 8970M). Raw compute: 3.379 TFLOPS (Radeon 680M) vs 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8970M). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 680M | Radeon HD 8970M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,836 | 3,876+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1280+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.379 TFLOPS+47% | 2.304 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2200 MHz+144% | 900 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 80+67% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 320 KB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 680M | Radeon HD 8970M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 680M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8970M has 4 GB. The Radeon HD 8970M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs System. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 680M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 8970M) — the Radeon 680M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 680M | Radeon HD 8970M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 680M draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 8970M's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon 680M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 680M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8970M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon 680M | Radeon HD 8970M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-50% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 76.7+98% | 38.8 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












