Quadro T2000 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

NVIDIA

Quadro T2000

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

7279

G3D Mark Score

7525

Performance Difference

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 3.4% faster than Quadro T2000

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Quadro T20004096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
22%
low75%
medium42%
high14%
ultra4%
1440pLow
10%
low42%
medium14%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
5%
low14%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 7,279 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti4096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
22%
low75%
medium42%
high14%
ultra4%
1440pLow
10%
low42%
medium14%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
5%
low14%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 7,525 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti performs 3.4% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Quadro T2000 and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Quadro T2000 and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

NVIDIA

Quadro T2000

The Quadro T2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. Core clock: 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,279 points. Launch price was $599.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16
TMUs:32
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:256 kB
L2 Cache:256 kB
Core Clock:625 MHz
Shading Units:192
Transistor Count:1,170 million
Texture Fill Rate:20.00
Manufacturing Process:40 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):62 Watt
Floating Point Performance:0.48 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GF106
Architecture:Fermi (2010βˆ’2014)
Launch Price:$599
Release Date:December 24 2010
Performance Ranking Position:902
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 9 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. Core clock: 928 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,525 points. Launch price was $149.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16
TMUs:64
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:64 kB
L2 Cache:256 kB
Core Clock:928 MHz
Shading Units:768
Max Temperature:105 Β°C
Transistor Count:2,540 million
Texture Fill Rate:59.39
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):110 Watt
Floating Point Performance:1.425 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GK106
Architecture:Kepler (2012βˆ’2018)
Launch Price:$149
Release Date:October 9 2012
Performance Ranking Position:633

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro T2000 and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti