
Quadro RTX 5000
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7700S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro RTX 5000
2018Why buy it
- ✅Newer upscaling generation: DLSS 4 Super Resolution (2025) vs FSR 3 (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7700S is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌412% HIGHER MSRP$2,299 MSRPvs$449 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 34.6 G3D/$ ($2,299 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌130% higher power demand at 230W vs 100W.
Radeon RX 7700S
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,850 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $2,299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 414.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 34.6 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $2,299 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 230W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
Quadro RTX 5000
2018Radeon RX 7700S
2023Why buy it
- ✅Newer upscaling generation: DLSS 4 Super Resolution (2025) vs FSR 3 (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,850 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $2,299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 414.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 34.6 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $2,299 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 230W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7700S is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌412% HIGHER MSRP$2,299 MSRPvs$449 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 34.6 G3D/$ ($2,299 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌130% higher power demand at 230W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7700S better than Quadro RTX 5000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro RTX 5000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro RTX 5000 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 217 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 177 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 48 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro RTX 5000 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 369 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 313 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 280 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 283 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro RTX 5000 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 695 FPS | 699 FPS |
| medium | 556 FPS | 559 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 347 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 521 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 417 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 347 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 347 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 232 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 175 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro RTX 5000 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 440 FPS |
| ultra | 347 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 463 FPS |
| medium | 410 FPS | 392 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 319 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 256 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 296 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 232 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 175 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 5000 and Radeon RX 7700S

Quadro RTX 5000
Quadro RTX 5000
The Quadro RTX 5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 1815 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,443 points. Launch price was $2,299.

Radeon RX 7700S
Radeon RX 7700S
The Radeon RX 7700S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,527 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 5000 scores 15,443 and the Radeon RX 7700S reaches 15,527 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 5000 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 7700S uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7700S). Raw compute: 11.15 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 20.48 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7700S). Boost clocks: 1815 MHz vs 2500 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 32 (Radeon RX 7700S) with 384 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,443 | 15,527 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+50% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.15 TFLOPS | 20.48 TFLOPS+84% |
| Boost Clock | 1815 MHz | 2500 MHz+38% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 192+50% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48+50% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The Quadro RTX 5000 uses DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 7700S relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The Quadro RTX 5000 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7700S relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 5000 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7700S has 8 GB. The Quadro RTX 5000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 7700S) — a 55.6% advantage for the Quadro RTX 5000. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7700S) — the Quadro RTX 5000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+56% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon RX 7700S). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX 5000) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7700S). Decoder: NVDEC (4th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 (Quadro RTX 5000) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7700S).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (7th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (4th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 5000 draws 230W versus the Radeon RX 7700S's 100W — a 78.8% difference. The Radeon RX 7700S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 650W (Radeon RX 7700S). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W | 100W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 67.1 | 155.3+131% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro RTX 5000 launched at $2299 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7700S launched at $449. The Radeon RX 7700S costs 80.5% less ($1850 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.7 (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 34.6 (Radeon RX 7700S) — the Radeon RX 7700S offers 416.4% better value. The Radeon RX 7700S is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2299 | $449-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.7 | 34.6+416% |
| Codename | TU104 | Navi 33 |
| Release | August 13 2018 | January 4 2023 |
| Ranking | #143 | #140 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












