
Quadro RTX 5000
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro RTX 5000
2018Why buy it
- ✅20.3% more average FPS across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌109.1% higher power demand at 230W vs 110W.
Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Turing on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 230W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Turing on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 5000 across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quadro RTX 5000
2018Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅20.3% more average FPS across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Turing on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 230W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Turing on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌109.1% higher power demand at 230W vs 110W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 5000 across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro RTX 5000 better than Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) make more sense than Quadro RTX 5000?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro RTX 5000 | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro RTX 5000 | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 455 FPS | 300 FPS |
| medium | 393 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 320 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 271 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 62 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro RTX 5000 | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 695 FPS | 692 FPS |
| medium | 556 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 461 FPS |
| ultra | 347 FPS | 346 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 521 FPS | 519 FPS |
| medium | 417 FPS | 415 FPS |
| high | 347 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 347 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 232 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 173 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro RTX 5000 | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 466 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 399 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 384 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 310 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 260 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 227 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 68 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 5000 and Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)

Quadro RTX 5000
Quadro RTX 5000
The Quadro RTX 5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 1815 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,443 points. Launch price was $2,299.

Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)
Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)
The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,372 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 5000 scores 15,443 and the Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) reaches 15,372 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 5000 is built on Turing while the Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 3,072 (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 11.15 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 9.492 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1815 MHz vs 1545 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 48 (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)) with 384 Tensor cores vs 384.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,443 | 15,372 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.15 TFLOPS+17% | 9.492 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1815 MHz+17% | 1545 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 192 | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 48 |
| Tensor Cores | 384 | 384 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smooth motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4) | Yes (DLSS 4) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 16 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX 5000) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)). Decoder: NVDEC (4th Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP10. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 (Quadro RTX 5000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (7th Gen) | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (4th Gen) | PureVideo HD VP10 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 5000 draws 230W versus the Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)'s 110W — a 70.6% difference. The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W | 110W-52% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 67.1 | 139.7+108% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro RTX 5000 launched at $2299 MSRP, while the Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) launched at $2299. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.7 (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 6.7 (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)) — the Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) offers 0% better value. The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2299 | $2299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Codename | TU104 | TU104 |
| Release | August 13 2018 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #143 | #181 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












