G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro RTX 5000

2018

Why buy it

✅23.3% more average FPS across 31 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 230W instead of 300W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 16 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 5000 across 31 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,299 MSRP).
❌30.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 230W.

Quadro RTX 5000

2018

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

✅23.3% more average FPS across 31 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 230W instead of 300W, a 70W reduction.

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 16 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 5000 across 31 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,299 MSRP).
❌30.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 230W.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro RTX 5000 better than Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU?

Yes. Quadro RTX 5000 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 23.3% more average FPS across 31 tracked games in our benchmark data, 1.2% higher PassMark G3D performance, and DLSS 4 + Multi Frame Gen.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro RTX 5000 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting better frame-generation support with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025) instead of FSR upscaling and a 12nm process instead of 14nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro RTX 5000 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. Quadro RTX 5000 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $2,299 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 23.3% more estimated average FPS across 31 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (15,443 vs 15,633). It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if Quadro RTX 5000 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro RTX 5000 Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro RTX 5000	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
1080p
low	214 FPS	166 FPS
medium	196 FPS	148 FPS
high	173 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	156 FPS	90 FPS
1440p
low	193 FPS	146 FPS
medium	161 FPS	124 FPS
high	135 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	126 FPS	65 FPS
4K
low	126 FPS	69 FPS
medium	106 FPS	60 FPS
high	85 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	37 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 5000 Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro RTX 5000	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
1080p
low	455 FPS	301 FPS
medium	393 FPS	255 FPS
high	320 FPS	201 FPS
ultra	271 FPS	158 FPS
1440p
low	282 FPS	203 FPS
medium	236 FPS	172 FPS
high	207 FPS	146 FPS
ultra	171 FPS	112 FPS
4K
low	128 FPS	99 FPS
medium	110 FPS	82 FPS
high	93 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	52 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 5000 Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro RTX 5000	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
1080p
low	695 FPS	703 FPS
medium	556 FPS	563 FPS
high	463 FPS	469 FPS
ultra	347 FPS	352 FPS
1440p
low	521 FPS	528 FPS
medium	417 FPS	422 FPS
high	347 FPS	352 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	264 FPS
4K
low	347 FPS	352 FPS
medium	278 FPS	281 FPS
high	232 FPS	234 FPS
ultra	174 FPS	176 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 5000 Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro RTX 5000	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
1080p
low	546 FPS	259 FPS
medium	466 FPS	224 FPS
high	399 FPS	190 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	153 FPS
1440p
low	447 FPS	197 FPS
medium	384 FPS	175 FPS
high	310 FPS	149 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	118 FPS
4K
low	278 FPS	121 FPS
medium	260 FPS	105 FPS
high	227 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	174 FPS	67 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 5000 Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 5000 and Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

Quadro RTX 5000

The Quadro RTX 5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 1815 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,443 points. Launch price was $2,299.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,633 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro RTX 5000 scores 15,443 and the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU reaches 15,633 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 5000 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Raw compute: 11.15 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 1815 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
G3D Mark Score	15,443	15,633+1%
Architecture	Turing	GCN 5.0
Process Node	12 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	3072	3584 ×2+17%
Compute (TFLOPS)	11.15 TFLOPS+4%	10.75 TFLOPS ×2
Boost Clock	1815 MHz+21%	1500 MHz
ROPs	64	64 ×2
TMUs	192	224 ×2+17%
L1 Cache	3 MB+241%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 5000 is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 5000 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 4 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 4)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro RTX 5000 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU has 32 GB. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
VRAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX 5000) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Decoder: NVDEC (4th Gen) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 (Quadro RTX 5000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU).

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Encoder	NVENC (7th Gen)	VCN 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC (4th Gen)	VCN 3.0
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX 5000 draws 230W versus the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU's 300W — a 26.4% difference. The Quadro RTX 5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 650W (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
TDP	230W-23%	300W
Recommended PSU	650W	650W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	267mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	75°C
Perf/Watt	67.1+29%	52.1