G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $5,850 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1942.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro P6000: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro P6000 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 15,512).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 23 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Quadro P6000

2016

Why buy it

✅+97.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅485.9% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (23 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 23 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
3926.2% HIGHER MSRP
$5,999 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($5,999 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.
❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Quadro P6000

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $5,850 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1942.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro P6000: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro P6000 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅+97.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅485.9% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (23 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 15,512).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 23 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 23 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
3926.2% HIGHER MSRP
$5,999 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($5,999 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.
❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro P6000 better than GeForce GTX 1650?

Yes. Quadro P6000 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 15,512 vs 7,869 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Quadro P6000 is a 2016 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2016 and a 12nm process instead of 16nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro P6000 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Quadro P6000 is about 3926.2% more expensive on MSRP at $5,999 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 97.1% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1650 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does GeForce GTX 1650 make more sense than Quadro P6000?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (75W vs 250W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $149 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro P6000. The trade-off is that Quadro P6000 currently gives you 97.1% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1650 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Quadro P6000 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P6000
1080p
low	94 FPS	197 FPS
medium	83 FPS	183 FPS
high	70 FPS	159 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	145 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	182 FPS
medium	74 FPS	153 FPS
high	60 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	116 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	114 FPS
medium	39 FPS	96 FPS
high	27 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	67 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Quadro P6000

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P6000
1080p
low	136 FPS	355 FPS
medium	113 FPS	306 FPS
high	94 FPS	227 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	182 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	225 FPS
medium	62 FPS	193 FPS
high	44 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	125 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	109 FPS
medium	27 FPS	91 FPS
high	21 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	58 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Quadro P6000

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P6000
1080p
low	323 FPS	698 FPS
medium	283 FPS	558 FPS
high	205 FPS	465 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	349 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	524 FPS
medium	202 FPS	419 FPS
high	151 FPS	349 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	262 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	349 FPS
medium	117 FPS	279 FPS
high	79 FPS	233 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	175 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Quadro P6000

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P6000
1080p
low	261 FPS	520 FPS
medium	211 FPS	451 FPS
high	191 FPS	387 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	319 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	422 FPS
medium	158 FPS	367 FPS
high	135 FPS	300 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	245 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	260 FPS
medium	74 FPS	247 FPS
high	65 FPS	215 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	175 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Quadro P6000

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Quadro P6000

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Quadro P6000

The Quadro P6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,512 points. Launch price was $5,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Quadro P6000's 15,512 — the Quadro P6000 leads by 97.1%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Quadro P6000 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3,840 (Quadro P6000). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P6000). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1645 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P6000
G3D Mark Score	7,869	15,512+97%
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Process Node	12 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	896	3840+329%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	12.63 TFLOPS+323%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+1%	1645 MHz
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	56	240+329%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	1.4 MB+59%
L2 Cache	1 MB	3 MB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P6000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P6000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P6000 has 23 GB. The Quadro P6000 offers 485.9% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 432 GB/s (Quadro P6000) — a 237.5% advantage for the Quadro P6000. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3 MB (Quadro P6000) — the Quadro P6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P6000
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	23.438 GB+486%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5X
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	432 GB/s+238%
Bus Width	128-bit	384-bit+200%
L2 Cache	1 MB	3 MB+200%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.1 (Quadro P6000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P6000
DirectX	12	12.1
Vulkan	1.4+27%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Quadro P6000). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P6000).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P6000
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	NVENC 5.0 (2x)
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	PureVideo HD VP8
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Quadro P6000's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 650W (Quadro P6000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P6000
TDP	75W-70%	250W
Recommended PSU	300W-54%	650W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+69%	62.0

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Quadro P6000 launched at $5999. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 97.5% less ($5850 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.6 (Quadro P6000) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1930.8% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).