Quadro P600 vs Radeon HD8970M

NVIDIA

Quadro P600

2017Core: 1430 MHzBoost: 1620 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon HD8970M

2013Core: 850 MHzBoost: 900 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro P600

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 40W instead of 100W, a 60W reduction.
  • More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD8970M across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Radeon HD8970M

2013

Why buy it

  • 47.8% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 150% higher power demand at 100W vs 40W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon HD8970M better than Quadro P600?
Yes. Radeon HD8970M is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 47.8% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data and 1.5% higher PassMark G3D performance. It also comes from 2013 instead of 2017, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro P600 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2017 generation instead of 2013, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 14nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon HD8970M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 47.8% more estimated average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data and 1.5% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon HD8970M is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Quadro P600 still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.
When does Quadro P600 make more sense than Radeon HD8970M?
Yes. Quadro P600 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (40W vs 100W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon HD8970M. The trade-off is that Radeon HD8970M currently gives you 1.5% higher G3D Mark and 47.8% more estimated average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetQuadro P600Radeon HD8970M
1080p
low32 FPS77 FPS
medium22 FPS63 FPS
high14 FPS49 FPS
ultra11 FPS32 FPS
1440p
low21 FPS65 FPS
medium14 FPS53 FPS
high7 FPS37 FPS
ultra6 FPS23 FPS
4K
low12 FPS23 FPS
medium8 FPS22 FPS
high5 FPS14 FPS
ultra4 FPS12 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetQuadro P600Radeon HD8970M
1080p
low79 FPS140 FPS
medium50 FPS105 FPS
high37 FPS76 FPS
ultra23 FPS49 FPS
1440p
low22 FPS96 FPS
medium16 FPS67 FPS
high11 FPS51 FPS
ultra8 FPS36 FPS
4K
low7 FPS47 FPS
medium4 FPS35 FPS
high4 FPS27 FPS
ultra3 FPS18 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetQuadro P600Radeon HD8970M
1080p
low149 FPS152 FPS
medium119 FPS121 FPS
high100 FPS101 FPS
ultra75 FPS76 FPS
1440p
low112 FPS114 FPS
medium90 FPS91 FPS
high75 FPS76 FPS
ultra56 FPS57 FPS
4K
low75 FPS76 FPS
medium60 FPS61 FPS
high50 FPS51 FPS
ultra37 FPS38 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetQuadro P600Radeon HD8970M
1080p
low149 FPS141 FPS
medium119 FPS112 FPS
high100 FPS97 FPS
ultra75 FPS76 FPS
1440p
low112 FPS102 FPS
medium90 FPS83 FPS
high75 FPS72 FPS
ultra56 FPS55 FPS
4K
low75 FPS60 FPS
medium60 FPS45 FPS
high50 FPS36 FPS
ultra37 FPS25 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P600 and Radeon HD8970M

NVIDIA

Quadro P600

The Quadro P600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,318 points. Launch price was $178.

AMD

Radeon HD8970M

The Radeon HD8970M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 14 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,369 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P600 scores 3,318 and the Radeon HD8970M reaches 3,369 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P600 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD8970M uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro P600) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD8970M). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro P600) vs 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon HD8970M). Boost clocks: 1620 MHz vs 900 MHz.

FeatureQuadro P600Radeon HD8970M
G3D Mark Score
3,318
3,369+2%
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 1.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
1280+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.244 TFLOPS
2.304 TFLOPS+85%
Boost Clock
1620 MHz+80%
900 MHz
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
24
80+233%
L1 Cache
144 KB
320 KB+122%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro P600Radeon HD8970M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro P600) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD8970M) — the Quadro P600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro P600Radeon HD8970M
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P600 draws 40W versus the Radeon HD8970M's 100W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro P600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P600) vs 350W (Radeon HD8970M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro P600Radeon HD8970M
TDP
40W-60%
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
145mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
83.0+146%
33.7
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro P600 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).

FeatureQuadro P600Radeon HD8970M
MSRP
$0
Codename
GP107
Neptune
Release
February 7 2017
May 14 2013
Ranking
#558
#507