
Quadro P600
Popular choices:

Radeon HD8970M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P600
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 100W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD8970M across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon HD8970M
2013Why buy it
- ✅47.8% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 100W vs 40W.
Quadro P600
2017Radeon HD8970M
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 100W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅47.8% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD8970M across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 100W vs 40W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon HD8970M better than Quadro P600?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Quadro P600 make more sense than Radeon HD8970M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P600 | Radeon HD8970M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 32 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 22 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 21 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 14 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 12 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P600 | Radeon HD8970M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 22 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 7 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 18 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P600 | Radeon HD8970M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 38 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P600 | Radeon HD8970M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 25 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P600 and Radeon HD8970M

Quadro P600
Quadro P600
The Quadro P600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,318 points. Launch price was $178.

Radeon HD8970M
Radeon HD8970M
The Radeon HD8970M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 14 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,369 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P600 scores 3,318 and the Radeon HD8970M reaches 3,369 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P600 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD8970M uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro P600) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD8970M). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro P600) vs 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon HD8970M). Boost clocks: 1620 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P600 | Radeon HD8970M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,318 | 3,369+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1280+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.244 TFLOPS | 2.304 TFLOPS+85% |
| Boost Clock | 1620 MHz+80% | 900 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 80+233% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB | 320 KB+122% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P600 | Radeon HD8970M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro P600) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD8970M) — the Quadro P600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P600 | Radeon HD8970M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P600 draws 40W versus the Radeon HD8970M's 100W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro P600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P600) vs 350W (Radeon HD8970M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro P600 | Radeon HD8970M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W-60% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 83.0+146% | 33.7 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P600 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro P600 | Radeon HD8970M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Codename | GP107 | Neptune |
| Release | February 7 2017 | May 14 2013 |
| Ranking | #558 | #507 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













