
Quadro P600
Popular choices:

Radeon E8870PCIe
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P600
2017Why buy it
- ✅68.8% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
Radeon E8870PCIe
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P600 across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quadro P600
2017Radeon E8870PCIe
2014Why buy it
- ✅68.8% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P600 across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro P600 better than Radeon E8870PCIe?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon E8870PCIe still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P600 | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 32 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 22 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 21 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 14 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 12 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P600 | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 22 FPS | 17 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 7 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P600 | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 31 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P600 | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 3 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P600 and Radeon E8870PCIe

Quadro P600
Quadro P600
The Quadro P600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,318 points. Launch price was $178.

Radeon E8870PCIe
Radeon E8870PCIe
The Radeon E8870PCIe is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 25 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 37W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,368 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P600 scores 3,318 and the Radeon E8870PCIe reaches 3,368 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P600 is built on Pascal while the Radeon E8870PCIe uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro P600) vs 640 (Radeon E8870PCIe). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro P600) vs 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon E8870PCIe). Boost clocks: 1620 MHz vs 625 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P600 | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,318 | 3,368+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.244 TFLOPS+55% | 0.8 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1620 MHz+159% | 625 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB | 160 KB+11% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P600 | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro P600) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon E8870PCIe) — the Quadro P600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P600 | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P600 draws 40W versus the Radeon E8870PCIe's 37W — a 7.8% difference. The Radeon E8870PCIe is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P600) vs 350W (Radeon E8870PCIe). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro P600 | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W | 37W-8% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 83.0 | 91.0+10% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P600 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Radeon E8870PCIe launched at $250. The Quadro P600 costs 100+% less ($250 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Quadro P600) vs 13.5 (Radeon E8870PCIe) — the Quadro P600 offers Infinity% better value. The Quadro P600 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | Quadro P600 | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 13.5 |
| Codename | GP107 | Venus |
| Release | February 7 2017 | January 25 2014 |
| Ranking | #558 | #734 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













