Quadro P5200 vs Radeon PRO W6600M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro P5200

2018

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Radeon PRO W6600M

2021

Why buy it

✅14.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 23.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Quadro P5200

2018

Radeon PRO W6600M

2021

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Why buy it

✅14.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 23.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon PRO W6600M better than Quadro P5200?

Yes. Radeon PRO W6600M is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon PRO W6600M averages 14.2% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 11,407 vs 11,650 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon PRO W6600M is a 2021 card with FSR upscaling, while Quadro P5200 is a 2018 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W6600M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 2018, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 7nm process instead of 16nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon PRO W6600M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $500 MSRP, and you are getting 14.2% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (11,407 vs 11,650). Quadro P5200 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon PRO W6600M is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Quadro P5200 still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.

Is Quadro P5200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro P5200 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $500 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, Radeon PRO W6600M earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P5200 Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W6600M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro P5200	Radeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low	117 FPS	140 FPS
medium	106 FPS	118 FPS
high	91 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	71 FPS
1440p
low	102 FPS	112 FPS
medium	87 FPS	92 FPS
high	75 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	66 FPS	52 FPS
4K
low	54 FPS	50 FPS
medium	48 FPS	43 FPS
high	40 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	28 FPS

Open Quadro P5200 Open Radeon PRO W6600M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro P5200	Radeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low	289 FPS	243 FPS
medium	239 FPS	206 FPS
high	185 FPS	168 FPS
ultra	147 FPS	134 FPS
1440p
low	192 FPS	170 FPS
medium	161 FPS	142 FPS
high	132 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	88 FPS
4K
low	101 FPS	93 FPS
medium	83 FPS	78 FPS
high	71 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	49 FPS

Open Quadro P5200 Open Radeon PRO W6600M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro P5200	Radeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low	513 FPS	513 FPS
medium	419 FPS	411 FPS
high	350 FPS	342 FPS
ultra	262 FPS	257 FPS
1440p
low	393 FPS	385 FPS
medium	315 FPS	308 FPS
high	262 FPS	257 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	192 FPS
4K
low	248 FPS	257 FPS
medium	205 FPS	205 FPS
high	162 FPS	171 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	128 FPS

Open Quadro P5200 Open Radeon PRO W6600M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro P5200	Radeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low	334 FPS	262 FPS
medium	272 FPS	231 FPS
high	245 FPS	186 FPS
ultra	208 FPS	157 FPS
1440p
low	253 FPS	199 FPS
medium	202 FPS	176 FPS
high	171 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	144 FPS	113 FPS
4K
low	133 FPS	117 FPS
medium	109 FPS	99 FPS
high	96 FPS	79 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	60 FPS

Open Quadro P5200 Open Radeon PRO W6600M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P5200 and Radeon PRO W6600M

Quadro P5200

The Quadro P5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1556 MHz to 1746 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,650 points.

Radeon PRO W6600M

The Radeon PRO W6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1224 MHz to 2034 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,407 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P5200 scores 11,650 and the Radeon PRO W6600M reaches 11,407 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5200 is built on Pascal while the Radeon PRO W6600M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro P5200) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Raw compute: 8.94 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200) vs 7.29 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600M). Boost clocks: 1746 MHz vs 2034 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P5200	Radeon PRO W6600M
G3D Mark Score	11,650+2%	11,407
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	16 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	2560+43%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.94 TFLOPS+23%	7.29 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1746 MHz	2034 MHz+16%
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	160+43%	112
L1 Cache	960 KB+88%	512 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P5200	Radeon PRO W6600M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P5200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6600M has 8 GB. The Radeon PRO W6600M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.

Feature	Quadro P5200	Radeon PRO W6600M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5200) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 5.

Feature	Quadro P5200	Radeon PRO W6600M
DirectX	12.1	12.2
Vulkan	1.1	1.2+9%
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4	5+25%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6600M).

Feature	Quadro P5200	Radeon PRO W6600M
Encoder	NVENC 5.0	VCN 3.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP7	VCN 3.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P5200 draws 100W versus the Radeon PRO W6600M's 90W — a 10.5% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5200) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Quadro P5200	Radeon PRO W6600M
TDP	100W	90W-10%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	0mm
Height	0mm	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	85°C	80°C-6%
Perf/Watt	116.5	126.7+9%