Quadro M6000 24GB vs Quadro P5200

NVIDIA

Quadro M6000 24GB

2016Core: 988 MHzBoost: 1114 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P5200

2018Core: 1556 MHzBoost: 1746 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro M6000 24GB

2016

Why buy it

  • 27.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 899.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $4,999 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 23.3 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • 150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.

Quadro P5200

2018

Why buy it

  • Costs $4,499 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 902% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.3 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
  • Less risky long-term buy than Quadro M6000 24GB: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro M6000 24GB is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
  • Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro M6000 24GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro P5200 better than Quadro M6000 24GB?
Yes. Quadro P5200 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 0.2% higher PassMark G3D performance. It also comes from 2018 instead of 2016, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro P5200 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2018 generation instead of 2016 and a 16nm process instead of 28nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Quadro P5200 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. Quadro P5200 is about $4,499 cheaper on MSRP at $500 MSRP versus $4,999 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 0.2% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 902%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.
Is Quadro M6000 24GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. Quadro M6000 24GB is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $4,999 MSRP, even if Quadro P5200 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetQuadro M6000 24GBQuadro P5200
1080p
low160 FPS117 FPS
medium142 FPS106 FPS
high119 FPS91 FPS
ultra86 FPS77 FPS
1440p
low140 FPS102 FPS
medium120 FPS87 FPS
high86 FPS75 FPS
ultra61 FPS66 FPS
4K
low67 FPS54 FPS
medium58 FPS48 FPS
high40 FPS40 FPS
ultra35 FPS36 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetQuadro M6000 24GBQuadro P5200
1080p
low191 FPS289 FPS
medium168 FPS239 FPS
high136 FPS185 FPS
ultra105 FPS147 FPS
1440p
low131 FPS192 FPS
medium106 FPS161 FPS
high83 FPS132 FPS
ultra63 FPS106 FPS
4K
low62 FPS101 FPS
medium52 FPS83 FPS
high47 FPS71 FPS
ultra38 FPS55 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetQuadro M6000 24GBQuadro P5200
1080p
low523 FPS513 FPS
medium418 FPS419 FPS
high349 FPS350 FPS
ultra262 FPS262 FPS
1440p
low392 FPS393 FPS
medium314 FPS315 FPS
high262 FPS262 FPS
ultra196 FPS197 FPS
4K
low262 FPS248 FPS
medium209 FPS205 FPS
high174 FPS162 FPS
ultra131 FPS124 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetQuadro M6000 24GBQuadro P5200
1080p
low233 FPS334 FPS
medium200 FPS272 FPS
high166 FPS245 FPS
ultra138 FPS208 FPS
1440p
low179 FPS253 FPS
medium157 FPS202 FPS
high125 FPS171 FPS
ultra102 FPS144 FPS
4K
low102 FPS133 FPS
medium82 FPS109 FPS
high65 FPS96 FPS
ultra52 FPS77 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M6000 24GB and Quadro P5200

NVIDIA

Quadro M6000 24GB

The Quadro M6000 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 5 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,625 points. Launch price was $4,999.

NVIDIA

Quadro P5200

The Quadro P5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1556 MHz to 1746 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,650 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M6000 24GB scores 11,625 and the Quadro P5200 reaches 11,650 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M6000 24GB is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro P5200 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 2,560 (Quadro P5200). Raw compute: 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 8.94 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200). Boost clocks: 1114 MHz vs 1746 MHz.

FeatureQuadro M6000 24GBQuadro P5200
G3D Mark Score
11,625
11,650
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
3072+20%
2560
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.844 TFLOPS
8.94 TFLOPS+31%
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
1746 MHz+57%
ROPs
96+50%
64
TMUs
256+60%
160
L1 Cache
1.1 MB+17%
0.94 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB+50%
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro M6000 24GBQuadro P5200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M6000 24GB comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5200 has 4 GB. The Quadro M6000 24GB offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 2 MB (Quadro P5200) — the Quadro M6000 24GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro M6000 24GBQuadro P5200
VRAM Capacity
24 GB+500%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
384-bit+50%
256-bit
L2 Cache
3 MB+50%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12/1 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5200). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro M6000 24GBQuadro P5200
DirectX
12/1
12.1
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.5
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP7. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200).

FeatureQuadro M6000 24GBQuadro P5200
Encoder
NVENC 4.0
NVENC 5.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP6
PureVideo HD VP7
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M6000 24GB draws 250W versus the Quadro P5200's 100W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro P5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 500W (Quadro P5200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

FeatureQuadro M6000 24GBQuadro P5200
TDP
250W
100W-60%
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
0mm
Height
112mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80°C-6%
85°C
Perf/Watt
46.5
116.5+151%
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro M6000 24GB launched at $4999 MSRP, while the Quadro P5200 launched at $500. The Quadro P5200 costs 90% less ($4499 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.3 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 23.3 (Quadro P5200) — the Quadro P5200 offers 913% better value. The Quadro P5200 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).

FeatureQuadro M6000 24GBQuadro P5200
MSRP
$4999
$500-90%
Performance per Dollar
2.3
23.3+913%
Codename
GM200
GP104
Release
March 5 2016
February 21 2018
Ranking
#233
#230