
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Quadro P5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,250 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 837.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 180W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro P5000
2016Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌903.6% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌38.5% higher power demand at 180W vs 130W.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Quadro P5000
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,250 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 837.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 180W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌903.6% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌38.5% higher power demand at 180W vs 130W.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro P5000 better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 OEM make more sense than Quadro P5000?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 252 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 77 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 573 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 286 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 344 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 143 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 300 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 111 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Quadro P5000

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Quadro P5000
Quadro P5000
The Quadro P5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,728 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Quadro P5000's 12,728 — the Quadro P5000 leads by 7%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Quadro P5000 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2,048 (Quadro P5000). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 12,728+7% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS+1% | 8.873 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz+1% | 1733 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 160+100% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+166% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P5000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5000 has 16 GB. The Quadro P5000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 288 GB/s (Quadro P5000) — a 28.6% advantage for the Quadro P5000. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 288 GB/s+29% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+30% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Quadro P5000's 180W — a 32.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 500W (Quadro P5000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-28% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | 267mm |
| Height | 124mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5+29% | 70.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Quadro P5000 launched at $2499. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 90% less ($2250 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 5.1 (Quadro P5000) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 837.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-90% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+837% | 5.1 |
| Codename | GA106 | GP104 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #224 | #206 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













