G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,850 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2171% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro M6000 24GB: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro M6000 24GB is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M6000 24GB across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Quadro M6000 24GB

2016

Why buy it

✅77.0% more average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
3255% HIGHER MSRP
$4,999 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.
❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Quadro M6000 24GB

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,850 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2171% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro M6000 24GB: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro M6000 24GB is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅77.0% more average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M6000 24GB across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
3255% HIGHER MSRP
$4,999 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.
❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro M6000 24GB better than GeForce GTX 1650?

Yes. Quadro M6000 24GB is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 77.0% more average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data, 47.7% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 24 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2016 instead of 2019, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2016 and a 12nm process instead of 28nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro M6000 24GB is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Quadro M6000 24GB is about 3255.0% more expensive on MSRP at $4,999 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 77.0% more estimated average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data and 47.7% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1650 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does GeForce GTX 1650 make more sense than Quadro M6000 24GB?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (75W vs 250W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $149 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro M6000 24GB. The trade-off is that Quadro M6000 24GB currently gives you 47.7% higher G3D Mark and 77.0% more estimated average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce GTX 1650 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Quadro M6000 24GB Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro M6000 24GB
1080p
low	94 FPS	160 FPS
medium	83 FPS	142 FPS
high	70 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	86 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	140 FPS
medium	74 FPS	120 FPS
high	60 FPS	86 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	61 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	67 FPS
medium	39 FPS	58 FPS
high	27 FPS	40 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	35 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Quadro M6000 24GB

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro M6000 24GB
1080p
low	136 FPS	191 FPS
medium	113 FPS	168 FPS
high	94 FPS	136 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	105 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	131 FPS
medium	62 FPS	106 FPS
high	44 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	63 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	62 FPS
medium	27 FPS	52 FPS
high	21 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	38 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Quadro M6000 24GB

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro M6000 24GB
1080p
low	323 FPS	523 FPS
medium	283 FPS	418 FPS
high	205 FPS	349 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	262 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	392 FPS
medium	202 FPS	314 FPS
high	151 FPS	262 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	196 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	262 FPS
medium	117 FPS	209 FPS
high	79 FPS	174 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	131 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Quadro M6000 24GB

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro M6000 24GB
1080p
low	261 FPS	233 FPS
medium	211 FPS	200 FPS
high	191 FPS	166 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	138 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	179 FPS
medium	158 FPS	157 FPS
high	135 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	102 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	102 FPS
medium	74 FPS	82 FPS
high	65 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	52 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Quadro M6000 24GB

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Quadro M6000 24GB

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Quadro M6000 24GB

The Quadro M6000 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 5 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,625 points. Launch price was $4,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Quadro M6000 24GB's 11,625 — the Quadro M6000 24GB leads by 47.7%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Quadro M6000 24GB uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3,072 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000 24GB). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1114 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro M6000 24GB
G3D Mark Score	7,869	11,625+48%
Architecture	Turing	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896	3072+243%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	6.844 TFLOPS+129%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+49%	1114 MHz
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	56	256+357%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	1.1 MB+25%
L2 Cache	1 MB	3 MB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M6000 24GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro M6000 24GB
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M6000 24GB has 24 GB. The Quadro M6000 24GB offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000 24GB) — a 147.7% advantage for the Quadro M6000 24GB. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3 MB (Quadro M6000 24GB) — the Quadro M6000 24GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro M6000 24GB
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	24 GB+500%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	317 GB/s+148%
Bus Width	128-bit	384-bit+200%
L2 Cache	1 MB	3 MB+200%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12/1 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro M6000 24GB
DirectX	12	12/1
Vulkan	1.4+27%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000 24GB).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro M6000 24GB
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	NVENC 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Quadro M6000 24GB's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 500W (Quadro M6000 24GB). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro M6000 24GB
TDP	75W-70%	250W
Recommended PSU	300W-40%	500W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	267mm
Height	111mm	112mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+126%	46.5

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Quadro M6000 24GB launched at $4999. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 97% less ($4850 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.3 (Quadro M6000 24GB) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 2195.7% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).