Quadro K6000 vs Radeon R9 290X

NVIDIA

Quadro K6000

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 290X

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

7993

G3D Mark Score

8426

Performance Difference

Radeon R9 290X is 5.4% faster than Quadro K6000

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Quadro K600012288 MB
016GB32GB
1080pMedium
52%
low86%
medium71%
high49%
ultra35%
1440pLow
39%
low71%
medium49%
high35%
ultra28%
4KLow
25%
low49%
medium35%
high28%
ultra11%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

12 GB VRAM Β· 7,993 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pMedium settings. Stable 60 FPS in most games.
1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.
4KLow settings only. Upscaling strongly recommended.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Quality mode: +30-40% FPS. Frame Gen available on RTX 40 series.

Radeon R9 290XN/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Radeon R9 290X performs 5.4% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Quadro K6000 and Radeon R9 290X.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Quadro K6000 and Radeon R9 290X

NVIDIA

Quadro K6000

The Quadro K6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,993 points. Launch price was $5,265.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:48
TMUs:240
Vram:12288 MB
L1 Cache:240 kB
L2 Cache:1536 kB
Core Clock:797 MHz
Boost Clock:902 MHz
Shading Units:2880
Transistor Count:7,080 million
Texture Fill Rate:216.5
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):225 Watt
Floating Point Performance:5.196 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GK110B
Architecture:Kepler (2012βˆ’2018)
Launch Price:$5,265
Release Date:July 23 2013
Performance Ranking Position:318
AMD

Radeon R9 290X

The Radeon R9 290X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 24 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. Boost clock: 947 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,426 points. Launch price was $549.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:64
TMUs:176
Vram:null
L1 Cache:704 kB
L2 Cache:1024 kB
Boost Clock:947 MHz
Shading Units:2816
Transistor Count:6,200 million
Texture Fill Rate:176.0
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):250 Watt
Floating Point Performance:5.632 TFLOPS

General Information

Design:reference
Codename:Hawaii
Architecture:GCN 2.0 (2013βˆ’2017)
Launch Price:$549
Release Date:October 24 2013
Performance Ranking Position:342

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K6000 and Radeon R9 290X