G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $8,850 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $8,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2399.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $8,999 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro GV100 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Quadro GV100

2018

Why buy it

✅172.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
5939.6% HIGHER MSRP
$8,999 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($8,999 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.
❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Quadro GV100

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $8,850 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $8,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2399.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $8,999 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅172.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro GV100 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
5939.6% HIGHER MSRP
$8,999 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($8,999 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.
❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro GV100 better than GeForce GTX 1650?

Yes. Quadro GV100 is clearly the better overall GPU here. Quadro GV100 averages 172.0% more FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 19,013 vs 7,869 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Quadro GV100 is a 2018 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2018. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro GV100 is about 5939.6% more expensive on MSRP at $8,999 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 172.0% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 141.6% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1650 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Quadro GV100 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce GTX 1650 still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.

When does GeForce GTX 1650 make more sense than Quadro GV100?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (75W vs 250W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $149 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro GV100. The trade-off is that Quadro GV100 currently gives you 141.6% higher G3D Mark and 172.0% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce GTX 1650 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Quadro GV100 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro GV100
1080p
low	94 FPS	210 FPS
medium	83 FPS	185 FPS
high	70 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	109 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	188 FPS
medium	74 FPS	158 FPS
high	60 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	80 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	94 FPS
medium	39 FPS	80 FPS
high	27 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	47 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Quadro GV100

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro GV100
1080p
low	136 FPS	385 FPS
medium	113 FPS	342 FPS
high	94 FPS	257 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	208 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	258 FPS
medium	62 FPS	224 FPS
high	44 FPS	174 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	141 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	128 FPS
medium	27 FPS	106 FPS
high	21 FPS	89 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	69 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Quadro GV100

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro GV100
1080p
low	323 FPS	856 FPS
medium	283 FPS	684 FPS
high	205 FPS	570 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	428 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	642 FPS
medium	202 FPS	513 FPS
high	151 FPS	428 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	321 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	428 FPS
medium	117 FPS	342 FPS
high	79 FPS	285 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	214 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Quadro GV100

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro GV100
1080p
low	261 FPS	318 FPS
medium	211 FPS	279 FPS
high	191 FPS	234 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	203 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	243 FPS
medium	158 FPS	219 FPS
high	135 FPS	185 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	157 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	148 FPS
medium	74 FPS	128 FPS
high	65 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	83 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Quadro GV100

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Quadro GV100

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Quadro GV100

The Quadro GV100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 27 2018. It features the Volta architecture. The core clock ranges from 1132 MHz to 1627 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,013 points. Launch price was $8,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Quadro GV100's 19,013 — the Quadro GV100 leads by 141.6%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Quadro GV100 uses Volta, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5,120 (Quadro GV100). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 16.66 TFLOPS (Quadro GV100). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1627 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro GV100
G3D Mark Score	7,869	19,013+142%
Architecture	Turing	Volta
Process Node	12 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	896	5120+471%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	16.66 TFLOPS+458%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+2%	1627 MHz
ROPs	32	128+300%
TMUs	56	320+471%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	10 MB+1036%
L2 Cache	1 MB	6 MB+500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro GV100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro GV100
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro GV100 has 32 GB. The Quadro GV100 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1024 GB/s (Quadro GV100) — a 700% advantage for the Quadro GV100. Bus width: 128-bit vs 4096-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6 MB (Quadro GV100) — the Quadro GV100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro GV100
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	32 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	HBM2
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	1024 GB/s+700%
Bus Width	128-bit	4096-bit+3100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	6 MB+500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.1 (Quadro GV100). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro GV100
DirectX	12	12.1
Vulkan	1.4+17%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro GV100). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 4th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265 (Quadro GV100).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro GV100
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	NVENC 6th Gen
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	NVDEC 4th Gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Quadro GV100's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 650W (Quadro GV100). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro GV100
TDP	75W-70%	250W
Recommended PSU	300W-54%	650W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+38%	76.1

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Quadro GV100 launched at $8999. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 98.3% less ($8850 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.1 (Quadro GV100) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 2414.3% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).