
Processor U300
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Processor U300
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $136 less on MSRP ($193 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,897 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 46.1 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($193 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +146.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Delivers 47.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 46.1 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌70.5% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$193 MSRP
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Processor U300 moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Processor U300
2023Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $136 less on MSRP ($193 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +146.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Delivers 47.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 46.1 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,897 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 46.1 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($193 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌70.5% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$193 MSRP
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Processor U300 moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Processor U300?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Processor U300 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Processor U300 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 428 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 337 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 242 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Processor U300 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 538 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 470 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 275 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Processor U300 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 555 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 396 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Processor U300 and Ryzen 7 3700X

Processor U300
Processor U300
The Processor U300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 5 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,897 points. Launch price was $193.


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Processor U300 packs 5 cores / 6 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Processor U300 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Processor U300 uses the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Processor U300 scores 8,897 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 86.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Processor U300 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Processor U300 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 5 / 6 | 8 / 16+60% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz+200% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 32 MB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-U (2023) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 8,897 | 22,430+152% |
Memory & Platform
The Processor U300 uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Processor U300 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Value Analysis
The Processor U300 launched at $193 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 3700X debuted at $329. On MSRP ($193 vs $329), the Processor U300 is $136 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Processor U300 delivers 46.1 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 38.6% better value option.
| Feature | Processor U300 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $193-41% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.1 | 68.2+48% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











