Core i5-13400F vs Xeon W-1290E

Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon W-1290E

10 Cores20 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2020

Popular choices:

i5-13400F

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

  • +31.3% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon W-1290E.

Trade-offs

  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1290E, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
  • Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Xeon W-1290E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon W-1290E

2020

Why buy it

  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (19,060 vs 25,029).
  • 46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
  • Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Xeon W-1290E?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-1290E makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 31.3% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is at an unclear MSRP at $196 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 31.3% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Xeon W-1290E is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.5% average FPS lead across 26 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 10/20. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-13400FXeon W-1290E
1080p
low171 FPS257 FPS
medium158 FPS237 FPS
high132 FPS202 FPS
ultra112 FPS175 FPS
1440p
low143 FPS221 FPS
medium123 FPS185 FPS
high99 FPS153 FPS
ultra84 FPS135 FPS
4K
low81 FPS151 FPS
medium74 FPS127 FPS
high59 FPS99 FPS
ultra46 FPS87 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-13400FXeon W-1290E
1080p
low545 FPS476 FPS
medium464 FPS431 FPS
high389 FPS366 FPS
ultra356 FPS331 FPS
1440p
low458 FPS417 FPS
medium403 FPS367 FPS
high345 FPS316 FPS
ultra301 FPS275 FPS
4K
low280 FPS258 FPS
medium247 FPS226 FPS
high231 FPS212 FPS
ultra204 FPS184 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-13400FXeon W-1290E
1080p
low530 FPS476 FPS
medium449 FPS476 FPS
high415 FPS476 FPS
ultra375 FPS476 FPS
1440p
low490 FPS476 FPS
medium422 FPS476 FPS
high382 FPS476 FPS
ultra343 FPS476 FPS
4K
low393 FPS476 FPS
medium331 FPS476 FPS
high296 FPS429 FPS
ultra246 FPS361 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-13400FXeon W-1290E
1080p
low626 FPS476 FPS
medium626 FPS476 FPS
high626 FPS476 FPS
ultra626 FPS476 FPS
1440p
low626 FPS476 FPS
medium626 FPS476 FPS
high598 FPS476 FPS
ultra521 FPS476 FPS
4K
low535 FPS476 FPS
medium492 FPS476 FPS
high439 FPS476 FPS
ultra382 FPS437 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Xeon W-1290E

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Intel

Xeon W-1290E

The Xeon W-1290E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,060 points. Launch price was $552.

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, matching the Xeon W-1290E's 10 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon W-1290E — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1290E (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-1290E uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon W-1290E's 19,060 — a 27.1% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Both processors carry 20 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i5-13400FXeon W-1290E
Cores / Threads
10 / 16
10 / 20
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz
4.8 GHz+4%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.5 GHz+40%
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)
20 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+400%
256 kB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark
25,029+31%
19,060
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211
Geekbench 6 Single
2,407
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,408
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-1290E uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-13400FXeon W-1290E
Socket
LGA1700
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Xeon W-1290E). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

FeatureCore i5-13400FXeon W-1290E
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming