Core i5-13400F vs Xeon Phi 7290

Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Phi 7290

72 Cores288 Thrd245 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2016

Popular choices:

i5-13400F

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

  • Draws 65W instead of 245W, a 180W reduction.
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Phi 7290.

Trade-offs

  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Phi 7290, which brings 72 cores / 288 threads.
  • Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Xeon Phi 7290 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Phi 7290

2016

Why buy it

  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 72 cores / 288 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (17,839 vs 25,029).
  • 276.9% higher power demand at 245W vs 65W.
  • Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Xeon Phi 7290?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Phi 7290 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 1.5% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 40.3% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is at an unclear MSRP at $196 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2016), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 72/288. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-13400FXeon Phi 7290
1080p
low171 FPS177 FPS
medium158 FPS143 FPS
high132 FPS113 FPS
ultra112 FPS88 FPS
1440p
low143 FPS141 FPS
medium123 FPS111 FPS
high99 FPS87 FPS
ultra84 FPS68 FPS
4K
low81 FPS66 FPS
medium74 FPS56 FPS
high59 FPS43 FPS
ultra46 FPS34 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-13400FXeon Phi 7290
1080p
low545 FPS136 FPS
medium464 FPS120 FPS
high389 FPS109 FPS
ultra356 FPS86 FPS
1440p
low458 FPS120 FPS
medium403 FPS108 FPS
high345 FPS97 FPS
ultra301 FPS77 FPS
4K
low280 FPS87 FPS
medium247 FPS81 FPS
high231 FPS72 FPS
ultra204 FPS56 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-13400FXeon Phi 7290
1080p
low530 FPS446 FPS
medium449 FPS446 FPS
high415 FPS446 FPS
ultra375 FPS446 FPS
1440p
low490 FPS446 FPS
medium422 FPS434 FPS
high382 FPS374 FPS
ultra343 FPS326 FPS
4K
low393 FPS394 FPS
medium331 FPS306 FPS
high296 FPS259 FPS
ultra246 FPS209 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-13400FXeon Phi 7290
1080p
low626 FPS446 FPS
medium626 FPS446 FPS
high626 FPS446 FPS
ultra626 FPS446 FPS
1440p
low626 FPS446 FPS
medium626 FPS446 FPS
high598 FPS446 FPS
ultra521 FPS420 FPS
4K
low535 FPS446 FPS
medium492 FPS405 FPS
high439 FPS361 FPS
ultra382 FPS310 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Xeon Phi 7290

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Intel

Xeon Phi 7290

The Xeon Phi 7290 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Knights Landing (2016) architecture. It features 72 cores and 288 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 245 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,839 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Phi 7290 offers 72 cores / 288 threads — the Xeon Phi 7290 has 62 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 1.7 GHz on the Xeon Phi 7290 — a 92.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Phi 7290 uses Knights Landing (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon Phi 7290's 17,839 — a 33.5% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 0 kB (total) on the Xeon Phi 7290.

FeatureCore i5-13400FXeon Phi 7290
Cores / Threads
10 / 16
72 / 288+620%
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz+171%
1.7 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz+67%
1.5 GHz
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)
0 kB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+150%
512 kB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Knights Landing (2016)
PassMark
25,029+40%
17,839
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211
Geekbench 6 Single
2,407
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,408
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Phi 7290 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-13400FXeon Phi 7290
Socket
LGA1700
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Xeon Phi 7290). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

FeatureCore i5-13400FXeon Phi 7290
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming