Core i5-13400F vs Xeon E-2468

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E-2468.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 26,652).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Xeon E-2468 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E-2468

2023

Why buy it

✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Xeon E-2468

2023

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E-2468.

Why buy it

✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 26,652).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Xeon E-2468 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2468 better than Core i5-13400F?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E-2468 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E-2468 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 1.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2468 is the better fit. You are getting 6.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E-2468 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon E-2468 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2468 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more overall headroom and a better platform outlook.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Xeon E-2468 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon E-2468
1080p
low	171 FPS	254 FPS
medium	158 FPS	245 FPS
high	132 FPS	204 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	175 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	220 FPS
medium	123 FPS	189 FPS
high	99 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	132 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	152 FPS
medium	74 FPS	130 FPS
high	59 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	88 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon E-2468

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon E-2468
1080p
low	545 FPS	616 FPS
medium	464 FPS	522 FPS
high	389 FPS	443 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	404 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	533 FPS
medium	403 FPS	467 FPS
high	345 FPS	398 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	342 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	313 FPS
medium	247 FPS	280 FPS
high	231 FPS	267 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	232 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon E-2468

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon E-2468
1080p
low	530 FPS	646 FPS
medium	449 FPS	529 FPS
high	415 FPS	466 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	404 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	588 FPS
medium	422 FPS	489 FPS
high	382 FPS	425 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	369 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	424 FPS
medium	331 FPS	369 FPS
high	296 FPS	335 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	285 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon E-2468

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon E-2468
1080p
low	626 FPS	666 FPS
medium	626 FPS	666 FPS
high	626 FPS	666 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	652 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	666 FPS
medium	626 FPS	666 FPS
high	598 FPS	608 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	535 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	536 FPS
medium	492 FPS	490 FPS
high	439 FPS	438 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	382 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon E-2468

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Xeon E-2468

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Xeon E-2468

The Xeon E-2468 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 26,652 points. Launch price was $426.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E-2468 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.2 GHz on the Xeon E-2468 — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2468 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). Both are built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture using a Intel 7 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon E-2468's 26,652 — a 6.3% lead for the Xeon E-2468. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2468.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon E-2468
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	5.2 GHz+13%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.6 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	24 MB (total)+20%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+60%
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	25,029	26,652+6%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon E-2468
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Xeon E-2468). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.