
Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:

Xeon E-2386G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅+28.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2386G across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Xeon E-2386G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E-2386G
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,468 vs 25,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Core i5-13400F
2023Xeon E-2386G
2021Why buy it
- ✅+28.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2386G across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Xeon E-2386G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,468 vs 25,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Xeon E-2386G?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Xeon E-2386G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 187 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Xeon E-2386G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 423 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 386 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 348 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 304 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 380 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 293 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 248 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Xeon E-2386G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 487 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 450 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 320 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Xeon E-2386G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 487 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 487 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Xeon E-2386G

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Xeon E-2386G
Xeon E-2386G
The Xeon E-2386G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,468 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E-2386G offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon E-2386G — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2386G (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E-2386G uses Rocket Lake-E (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon E-2386G's 19,468 — a 25% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2386G.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Xeon E-2386G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+67% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz+40% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+67% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Rocket Lake-E (2021) |
| PassMark | 25,029+29% | 19,468 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E-2386G uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Xeon E-2386G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Xeon E-2386G). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Xeon E-2386G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













