
Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:

Xeon E-2134
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +44.2% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 71W, a 6W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Xeon E-2134 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E-2134
2018Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,356 vs 25,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Core i5-13400F
2023Xeon E-2134
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +44.2% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 71W, a 6W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Xeon E-2134 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,356 vs 25,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Xeon E-2134?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Xeon E-2134 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Xeon E-2134 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 177 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 204 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 106 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Xeon E-2134 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 234 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Xeon E-2134 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 234 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Xeon E-2134

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Xeon E-2134
Xeon E-2134
The Xeon E-2134 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 July 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 71 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 9,356 points. Launch price was $256.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E-2134 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon E-2134 — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E-2134 uses Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon E-2134's 9,356 — a 91.2% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2134.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Xeon E-2134 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+150% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+2% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz+40% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+150% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 25,029+168% | 9,356 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E-2134 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Xeon E-2134 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Xeon E-2134). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Xeon E-2134 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













