PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon 6357P.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6357P across 30 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 18,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Xeon 6357P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon 6357P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 30 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Xeon 6357P

2025

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon 6357P.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 30 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6357P across 30 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 18,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Xeon 6357P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Trade-offs

❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6357P better than Core i5-13400F?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon 6357P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon 6357P is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 4.7% more average FPS across 30 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6357P is the better fit. You are getting 11% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6357P is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon 6357P is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 30 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6357P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023), 20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB), more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 10/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Xeon 6357P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon 6357P
1080p
low	171 FPS	257 FPS
medium	158 FPS	246 FPS
high	132 FPS	205 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	176 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	222 FPS
medium	123 FPS	190 FPS
high	99 FPS	152 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	133 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	153 FPS
medium	74 FPS	130 FPS
high	59 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	88 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon 6357P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon 6357P
1080p
low	545 FPS	620 FPS
medium	464 FPS	523 FPS
high	389 FPS	442 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	408 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	532 FPS
medium	403 FPS	467 FPS
high	345 FPS	398 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	346 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	311 FPS
medium	247 FPS	278 FPS
high	231 FPS	265 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	233 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon 6357P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon 6357P
1080p
low	530 FPS	646 FPS
medium	449 FPS	529 FPS
high	415 FPS	466 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	404 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	588 FPS
medium	422 FPS	489 FPS
high	382 FPS	425 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	369 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	424 FPS
medium	331 FPS	369 FPS
high	296 FPS	335 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	285 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon 6357P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon 6357P
1080p
low	626 FPS	760 FPS
medium	626 FPS	760 FPS
high	626 FPS	726 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	652 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	760 FPS
medium	626 FPS	704 FPS
high	598 FPS	609 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	536 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	537 FPS
medium	492 FPS	490 FPS
high	439 FPS	439 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	383 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon 6357P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Xeon 6357P

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Xeon 6357P

The Xeon 6357P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 30,401 points. Launch price was $556.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon 6357P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon 6357P — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Xeon 6357P (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon 6357P uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon 6357P's 30,401 — a 19.4% lead for the Xeon 6357P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 18,000 (10.5% advantage for the Xeon 6357P). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 2,784, a 14.5% lead for the Xeon 6357P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 12,769 (11.3% advantage for the Xeon 6357P). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon 6357P.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon 6357P
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	5.1 GHz+11%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	24 MB (total)+20%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+60%
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
PassMark	25,029	30,401+21%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	18,000+11%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	2,784+16%
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	12,769+12%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and Server chipsets (Xeon 6357P).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon 6357P
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon 6357P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon 6357P). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Xeon 6357P targets Edge Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Xeon 6357P rivals Core i7-14700.