PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $9,803 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 792.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 148,000).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX, which brings 96 cores / 192 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +40.6% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 96 cores / 192 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $9,803 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 792.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +40.6% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 96 cores / 192 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 148,000).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX, which brings 96 cores / 192 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX better than Core i5-13400F?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 40.6% more average FPS across 7 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 384 MB vs 20 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is the better fit. You are getting 813% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 96 cores and 192 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 1820% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is 5001.5% more expensive on MSRP at $9,999 MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it gives you a 40.6% average FPS lead across 7 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400F is also 792.8% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 14.3 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 3D V-Cache and a much larger 384 MB L3 cache instead of 20 MB, more multi-core headroom with 96 cores / 192 threads instead of 10/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
1080p
low	171 FPS	304 FPS
medium	158 FPS	288 FPS
high	132 FPS	230 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	194 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	272 FPS
medium	123 FPS	233 FPS
high	99 FPS	174 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	154 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	188 FPS
medium	74 FPS	160 FPS
high	59 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	109 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
1080p
low	545 FPS	780 FPS
medium	464 FPS	676 FPS
high	389 FPS	545 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	470 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	648 FPS
medium	403 FPS	578 FPS
high	345 FPS	477 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	382 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	360 FPS
medium	247 FPS	324 FPS
high	231 FPS	303 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	260 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
1080p
low	530 FPS	795 FPS
medium	449 FPS	667 FPS
high	415 FPS	590 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	499 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	704 FPS
medium	422 FPS	593 FPS
high	382 FPS	514 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	436 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	495 FPS
medium	331 FPS	420 FPS
high	296 FPS	375 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	317 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
1080p
low	626 FPS	1120 FPS
medium	626 FPS	997 FPS
high	626 FPS	874 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	771 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	923 FPS
medium	626 FPS	801 FPS
high	598 FPS	706 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	614 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	673 FPS
medium	492 FPS	598 FPS
high	439 FPS	537 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	437 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 143,017 points. Launch price was $9,999.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX offers 96 cores / 192 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX has 86 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX's 143,017 — a 140.4% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 148,000 (160.5% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 2,100, a 13.6% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 81,000 (150.6% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 384 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	96 / 192+860%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	5.1 GHz+11%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	384 MB (total)+1820%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	5 nm-29%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Storm Peak (2023)
PassMark	25,029	143,017+471%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	148,000+813%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407+15%	2,100
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	81,000+610%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 165.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Socket	LGA1700	sTR5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	2048 GB+967%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX targets Workstation / Scientific Computing. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX rivals Xeon w9-3495X.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true
Target Use	Gaming	Workstation / Scientific Computing

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX debuted at $9999. On MSRP ($196 vs $9999), the Core i5-13400F is $9803 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 14.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX — making the Core i5-13400F the 159.7% better value option.