PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $7,153 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $7,349 MSRP).
✅Delivers 604.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 18.1 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $7,349 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 100,000).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +37.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.1 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($7,349 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $7,153 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $7,349 MSRP).
✅Delivers 604.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 18.1 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $7,349 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +37.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 100,000).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.1 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($7,349 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX better than Core i5-13400F?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 37.2% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 256 MB vs 20 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is the better fit. You are getting 516.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 1180% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is 3649.5% more expensive on MSRP at $7,349 MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it gives you a 37.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400F is also 604.8% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 18.1 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 3D V-Cache and a much larger 256 MB L3 cache instead of 20 MB, more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 10/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
1080p
low	171 FPS	302 FPS
medium	158 FPS	279 FPS
high	132 FPS	230 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	195 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	268 FPS
medium	123 FPS	223 FPS
high	99 FPS	171 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	152 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	185 FPS
medium	74 FPS	154 FPS
high	59 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	104 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
1080p
low	545 FPS	787 FPS
medium	464 FPS	672 FPS
high	389 FPS	529 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	462 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	649 FPS
medium	403 FPS	577 FPS
high	345 FPS	469 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	380 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	363 FPS
medium	247 FPS	327 FPS
high	231 FPS	302 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	265 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
1080p
low	530 FPS	889 FPS
medium	449 FPS	728 FPS
high	415 FPS	654 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	556 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	693 FPS
medium	422 FPS	567 FPS
high	382 FPS	498 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	419 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	490 FPS
medium	331 FPS	407 FPS
high	296 FPS	365 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	303 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
1080p
low	626 FPS	1131 FPS
medium	626 FPS	1014 FPS
high	626 FPS	889 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	802 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	890 FPS
medium	626 FPS	783 FPS
high	598 FPS	688 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	599 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	649 FPS
medium	492 FPS	579 FPS
high	439 FPS	514 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	437 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 133,149 points. Launch price was $7,349.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX has 54 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX's 133,149 — a 136.7% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 100,000 (144.2% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 2,599, a 7.7% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 24,780 (73.9% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 256 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	64 / 128+540%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	5.1 GHz+11%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.2 GHz+28%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	256 MB (total)+1180%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	5 nm-29%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Storm Peak (2023)
PassMark	25,029	133,149+432%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	100,000+517%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	2,599+8%
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	24,780+117%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 165.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
Socket	LGA1700	sTR5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	2048 GB+967%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX rivals Xeon w9-3475X.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true
Target Use	Gaming	High-end Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX debuted at $7349. On MSRP ($196 vs $7349), the Core i5-13400F is $7153 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 18.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX — making the Core i5-13400F the 150.3% better value option.