
Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 35,133).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 890M, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Core i5-13400F
2023Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2024Why buy it
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 890M, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 35,133).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 better than Core i5-13400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 351 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 254 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 230 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 135 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 758 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 602 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 525 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 443 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 677 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 545 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 400 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 491 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 410 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 369 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 309 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 878 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 811 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 695 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 627 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 759 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 680 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 583 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 515 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 519 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 369 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.


Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 35,133 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 uses Strix Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370's 35,133 — a 33.6% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 24 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 12 / 24+20% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+25% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 24 MB (total)+20% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Strix Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 25,029 | 35,133+40% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus 7500 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 — the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 supports up to 256 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370) — the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and FP8 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370).
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | 7500+149900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+78643100% | 256 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370). The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 890M), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 rivals Core Ultra 9 185H.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon 890M |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V, SVM |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($196 vs $0), the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is $196 cheaper.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $196 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 127.7 | — |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












