
Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 3800X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅+8.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $203 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 121.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 57.7 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3800X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 3800X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,008 vs 25,029).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 57.7 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Core i5-13400F
2023Ryzen 7 3800X
2019Why buy it
- ✅+8.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $203 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 121.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 57.7 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3800X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,008 vs 25,029).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 57.7 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Ryzen 7 3800X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 7 3800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 7 3800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 575 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 401 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 348 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 352 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 244 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 7 3800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 575 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 575 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 575 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 575 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 575 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 575 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 542 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 472 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 287 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 7 3800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 575 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 575 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 575 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 575 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 575 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 575 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 575 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 575 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 575 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 425 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 7 3800X

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.


Ryzen 7 3800X
Ryzen 7 3800X
The Ryzen 7 3800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 23,008 points. Launch price was $399.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3800X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3800X — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3800X uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen 7 3800X's 23,008 — a 8.4% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3800X.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 7 3800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+2% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.9 GHz+56% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 32 MB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 25,029+9% | 23,008 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 3800X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3800X — the Core i5-13400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3800X) — the Ryzen 7 3800X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series (Ryzen 7 3800X).
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 7 3800X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 3800X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 3800X). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Ryzen 7 3800X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 7 3800X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 3800X debuted at $399. On MSRP ($196 vs $399), the Core i5-13400F is $203 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 57.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3800X — making the Core i5-13400F the 75.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 7 3800X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $196-51% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 127.7+121% | 57.7 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












